Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured reference: nearly all guidance is executable YAML or commands organized in a clear stepwise workflow with an anti-patterns table and honest limitations. Remaining gaps are a missing eval-failure feedback loop, an inline catalog that would fit better in a reference file, and a few version-sensitive details.
Suggestions
Add a short 'When evals fail' note (e.g., inspect promptfoo view output, loosen flaky deterministic asserts toward llm-rubric/similar, re-run) to close the feedback loop in the workflow.
Move provider API key setup (e.g., export OPENAI_API_KEY) from Step 8 into Step 2 so the first local promptfoo eval can actually run.
Split the Step 4 assertion catalog into a references/ file (e.g., references/assertions.md) and keep only the most common types inline to improve progressive disclosure and token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence (no explanations of YAML, CI, or embeddings), but the exhaustive deterministic-assertion table and version-pinned specifics like "Node.js 20.20+ or 22.22+" and "openai:gpt-5-mini-0613" are minor trims that keep it below the lean-everything-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is copy-paste ready: install commands, a complete minimal promptfooconfig.yaml, working interpolation/defaultTest/transform/assert-set YAML snippets, and the exact GitHub Action inputs including cache-path and no-share, covering the common cases the description promises. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The eight steps (install → first eval → interpolation → assertions → defaultTest → transforms → assert-set → CI) are clearly sequenced with eval/view and CI gating as checkpoints, but there is no explicit failure-recovery loop and provider API keys are only introduced in Step 8 for CI, not before the first local eval. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with a one-level-deep References list of real external doc URLs, but the ~60-line inline assertion catalog is content a bundle reference file would ideally hold, and the link-reference definitions sit at the top of the file before any prose, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |