CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/quality-status-digest

Computes a recurring quality status digest from metrics that already exist: CI pass rate with an explicit denominator rule, escape-defect count, and a flake-debt score, assigns red / amber / green per area against stated thresholds, then rolls the same per-team rows into a portfolio view with a severity-by-blast-radius heatmap, STABLE / WATCH / INVEST tags, and a capacity flag. Keeps DORA delivery metrics separate from defect-leakage and flake measures instead of blending them under one label. Produces the status artifact only: it does not instrument anything, does not define SLOs or targets, and does not decide what gets fixed first. Use when a weekly quality review, sprint check-in, or quarterly portfolio review is due and the CI history, defect tracker, and quarantine list already hold the numbers but nobody has assembled them into one page.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, two-altitude workflow with concrete formulas, explicit thresholds, validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep references to real bundle files. It earns the top anchor on all four dimensions with no concept padding or pseudocode.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean, domain-specific guidance with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the prose that exists justifies non-standard conventions (denominator rules, threshold basis, DORA separation) which is the actual value of the skill, so every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides executable formulas ('pass_rate = successful_runs / (successful_runs + failed_runs)', 'flake_debt_score = (stale_quarantine_count * 2) + new_flakes_in_window'), a concrete copy-paste 'digest-row' contract, specific threshold tables, and full output templates via reference - fully actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced Step 1-10 process with explicit validation checkpoints - exclude cancelled runs from the denominator, 'Do not silently switch denominators', 'mark partial rather than guessing', '[DATA NOT SUPPLIED] rather than estimating', 'state the threshold basis ... every time' - plus an anti-patterns table reinforcing the feedback loops.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md keeps the method while splitting the full templates and verbatim DORA definitions into one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (references/output-templates.md, references/dora-metrics.md), both of which exist as real files; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, complete with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, and sharply scoped with non-ownership boundaries. It is a strong example that hits the top anchor on every dimension.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions - 'Computes a recurring quality status digest', 'CI pass rate with an explicit denominator rule, escape-defect count, and a flake-debt score, assigns red / amber / green ... rolls ... into a portfolio view with a severity-by-blast-radius heatmap, STABLE / WATCH / INVEST tags, and a capacity flag' - matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (computes the digest, rolls up to portfolio) and when via a clear 'Use when a weekly quality review, sprint check-in, or quarterly portfolio review is due ...' trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would actually say - 'weekly quality review, sprint check-in, or quarterly portfolio review' and 'CI history, defect tracker, and quarantine list' - giving good coverage rather than jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (assembling existing metrics into a status artifact) and draws explicit boundaries - 'does not instrument anything, does not define SLOs or targets, and does not decide what gets fixed first' - making conflict with adjacent skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents