CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

testland/ragas-evaluation

Use for any question or task about RAG or agent evaluation metrics, including which metrics to use, scoring an answer against its contexts, and telling retrieval problems from generation problems after a change such as chunk size: Ragas faithfulness, response relevancy, context precision and recall, noise sensitivity, factual correctness, tool-call accuracy, agent goal accuracy and rubric scoring.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.md

name:
ragas-evaluation
description:
Use for any question or task about RAG or agent evaluation metrics, including which metrics to use, scoring an answer against its contexts, and telling retrieval problems from generation problems after a change such as chunk size: Ragas faithfulness, response relevancy, context precision and recall, noise sensitivity, factual correctness, tool-call accuracy, agent goal accuracy and rubric scoring.

ragas-evaluation

The model: assemble a dataset (user_input + response + retrieved_contexts + reference), import the metrics relevant to the evaluation goal, run evaluate(), and inspect per-metric per-row scores (per rg-gh).

When to use

  • The repo uses LangChain / LlamaIndex / Haystack / direct retriever→LLM RAG pipelines.
  • You need RAG-specific retrieval + generation quality scoring, or agents-style eval (tool-call and goal accuracy), and want the widest metric variety in OSS LLM-eval.

For non-RAG prompt evals, prefer promptfoo-evaluation. For pytest-native LLM evals with a managed dashboard, prefer deepeval-evaluation.

Step 1 - Install

Per rg-gh:

pip install ragas

Or from source:

pip install git+https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas

Step 2 - Custom metric quickstart

Per rg-gh (verbatim):

import asyncio
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from ragas.metrics import DiscreteMetric
from ragas.llms import llm_factory

# Setup your LLM
client = AsyncOpenAI()
llm = llm_factory("gpt-4o", client=client)

# Create a custom aspect evaluator
metric = DiscreteMetric(
    name="summary_accuracy",
    allowed_values=["accurate", "inaccurate"],
    prompt="""Evaluate if the summary is accurate and captures
key information.
Response: {response}
Answer with only 'accurate' or 'inaccurate'."""
)

# Score your application's output
async def main():
    score = await metric.ascore(
        llm=llm,
        response="The summary of the text is..."
    )
    print(f"Score: {score.value}")
    print(f"Reason: {score.reason}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

DiscreteMetric is the pattern for custom rubric-based scoring; the built-in metrics in Step 3 follow a similar shape but are preconfigured.

Step 3 - Pick metrics

Ragas ships 30+ metrics across RAG, Natural Language Comparison, Agents/Tool-Use, SQL, General Purpose, Nvidia, and Summarization families. The RAG core: Faithfulness (claims grounded in retrieved context), Response Relevancy, Context Precision, and Context Recall. Pick 3 - 5 per pipeline.

Full per-family catalog with each metric's use: references/metrics.md, sourced from docs.ragas.io/en/stable/concepts/metrics/available_metrics/.

Step 4 - Dataset shape

Each row is a SingleTurnSample; build the set with EvaluationDataset.from_list([...]) (rg-sample, rg-start). The fields match the metrics being run:

FieldRequired by
user_input (the question)All RAG metrics
response (the generated answer)Response Relevancy, Faithfulness, NL Comparison
retrieved_contexts (list of strings)Context Precision/Recall, Faithfulness
reference (the ground-truth answer)Context Recall, Factual Correctness, Answer Accuracy
reference_contextsContext-comparison metrics

Older tutorials use question, answer, contexts and ground_truth; the current sample fields are the names above.

from ragas import EvaluationDataset

dataset = EvaluationDataset.from_list([
    {
        "user_input": "When was the refund window extended?",
        "retrieved_contexts": ["Refunds are accepted within 60 days since March 2026."],
        "response": "In March 2026, to 60 days.",
        "reference": "March 2026",
    },
])

See the per-metric pages on docs.ragas.io for exact required-column lists.

Step 5 - Integration with retrieval frameworks

Ragas integrates with LangChain + LlamaIndex retrieval pipelines - the integration code captures retrieved_contexts from the retriever and response from the generator into the evaluation dataset automatically. Consult the per-framework integration docs on docs.ragas.io when wiring; APIs evolve faster than this skill body and the canonical doc is the source of truth.

Step 6 - CI integration

Ragas does not ship a first-party CI action. Pattern: run evaluate() in a pytest fixture or a CLI script, compare per-metric scores against thresholds, fail CI on regression.

from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import faithfulness, answer_relevancy

result = evaluate(dataset, metrics=[faithfulness, answer_relevancy])
assert result["faithfulness"] >= 0.85
assert result["answer_relevancy"] >= 0.80

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Run all 30+ metrics on every PRCost + latency explodePick 3 - 5 metrics per pipeline (Step 3)
Faithfulness without retrieved_contextsMetric returns NaN / errorsPass retrieved_contexts per dataset spec (Step 4)
Pin nothingRagas + judge-model versions both driftPin both in requirements + CI env
Skip Aspect Critic for product-specific concernsBuilt-in metrics miss the requirementCustom Aspect Critic + rubric (Step 3)

Limitations

  • Many metrics require a judge LLM → cost scales with metric count × dataset size.
  • Multimodal metrics need the multimodal extras (pip install ragas[multimodal]); check the per-metric doc on docs.ragas.io.
  • API surface evolves - pin versions in requirements; the canonical doc is the source of truth (this skill body curates the mainstream patterns but does not re-litigate per-method signatures).

References

  • rg-gh - repository + install
  • rg-metrics - full metric catalog
  • rg-docs - full documentation including per-metric pages, integration guides
  • deepeval-evaluation, promptfoo-evaluation - sister tools (different framework styles)

SKILL.md

tile.json