Use when Redis is the app's cache and its behavior needs tests, or when choosing a cache invalidation strategy: TTLs, cache-aside write and invalidate, eviction under memory pressure, pub/sub invalidation across nodes and tenant key namespaces, plus stampede and stale-while-revalidate patterns.
84%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
The three families named in stampede.md, in full, per Wikipedia's cache-stampede article. That file summarises each in one line and keeps the XFetch formula; this file carries the implementations, drawbacks, and the XFetch variable table.
Upon cache miss, processes attempt to acquire a lock for that key. Only the lock holder recomputes; others either wait, return "not found," or use a stale value.
def get(key):
val = cache.get(key)
if val is not None and not val.stale:
return val
if cache.acquire_lock(key, ttl=30):
try:
val = recompute(key)
cache.set(key, val, ttl=300)
return val
finally:
cache.release_lock(key)
else:
# Another process is recomputing; serve stale or wait
return val or wait_then_get(key)Drawbacks per Wikipedia: "complex implementation handling edge cases like process failures and race conditions." Lock holder crashing → cache empty for the lock TTL.
Mitigation: short-TTL locks with periodic refresh while recomputing.
A separate process recomputes the cache periodically or near expiry, decoupled from the request path. Per Wikipedia: "triggered when values approach expiration, periodically, or on cache miss."
# Cron / scheduled job
def refresh_hot_keys():
for key in HOT_KEYS:
val = recompute(key)
cache.set(key, val, ttl=600)When it fits: static cache keys ("homepage data," "top-10 products"). Hot keys are knowable in advance. The recompute schedule overlaps the cache TTL.
Drawback: doesn't help with unknown / user-specific hot keys; needs separate infrastructure.
Each requester independently decides - with rising probability as the value ages - to refresh before formal expiry. Per Wikipedia, the canonical formula:
if (!value || (time() - delta * beta * log(rand(0,1))) >= expiry)
recompute_and_cache(key)
else
return valueWhere:
| Variable | Meaning |
|---|---|
delta | Time to recompute the value (scales the probability distribution) |
beta | Tuning parameter (default 1; >1 favours earlier refresh) |
log(rand(0,1)) | Always negative; magnitude controls the early-refresh probability |
time() | Wall-clock or monotonic time |
expiry | Absolute expiry time stored alongside the value |
The "exponential distribution" of refresh decisions means most requesters use the cached value; only a few do early refresh. Per Wikipedia: "setting beta=1 works well in practice."
Implementation:
import math, random, time
def get_xfetch(key):
entry = cache.get(key) # contains {value, expiry, delta}
if not entry:
val, delta = measure_recompute(key)
expiry = time.time() + 300
cache.set(key, {"value": val, "expiry": expiry, "delta": delta}, ttl=300)
return val
now = time.time()
rand = max(random.random(), 1e-10)
if now - entry["delta"] * 1.0 * math.log(rand) >= entry["expiry"]:
# Early refresh
val, delta = measure_recompute(key)
expiry = now + 300
cache.set(key, {"value": val, "expiry": expiry, "delta": delta}, ttl=300)
return val
return entry["value"]The delta (recompute cost) is measured during refresh and
stored. Expensive-to-recompute values get earlier refresh
attempts.