Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered, token-efficient skill: executable core logic inline, supporting detail in a real one-level reference, an explicit safety/validation feedback loop, and a dense anti-patterns checklist. It exemplifies the score-3 anchors across all four content dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — executable code, compact tables, and a tight anti-patterns table with no basics-fluff (the TIA framing is specialized knowledge, not a 'what is a PDF' explanation), and no time-sensitive pins that would age. Not score 2 because nothing reads as unnecessary padding that could simply be cut without loss. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable Python (build_map, select_tests), a concrete git diff command, and a copy-paste PR-comment template, with per-framework recipes and CI YAML in a real reference file; not score 2 because the inline code is complete and executable rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation in Step 5 (run selected T1 then all T2 and confirm they agree), an explicit feedback loop (shadow full run → investigate drift → update map), fallback-to-full-suite error recovery, and an anti-patterns checklist; batch-operation validation is present so workflow clarity is not capped at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Core selector logic stays inline while per-framework instrumentation and the CI workflow are offloaded to references/instrumentation-and-ci.md, signaled twice (Step 2, Step 5) and one level deep (verified: the reference does not nest further); not score 2 because content is appropriately split with clear navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |