Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, multi-step instruction skill: lean and concrete, with exact authority matrices, quantified rationale guidance, and a real referenced examples file. It earns top marks on every dimension with only trivial editorial tightening possible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense — four purpose-built tables and concrete matrices instead of prose — and never explains concepts Claude already knows; the only mildly editorial touches (Overview motivation, 'The hardest part.') are minimal and clarify purpose rather than pad. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete and copy-ready throughout: an exact score-to-authority matrix (1-5/6-9/10-14/15-19/20-25), a quantified rationale table, a named ordered document-section list in Step 5, and filled markdown templates for the register entry, decisions index, and annual review log. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with explicit requirement gates (Step 3 'Two questions need explicit answers', Step 4 'At minimum: time + score-change trigger') and an Anti-patterns table that functions as a review checklist; no destructive/batch validation gap applies to document authoring. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Core workflow lives inline while the two filled examples are offloaded to a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (references/example-decisions.md), which exists in the bundle; navigation is easy and the split is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |