Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete templates, commands, and a clear step sequence backed by real one-level-deep reference files. The main gaps are the absent scripts/build-risk-coverage.py invoked in the CI example and slightly implicit error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
Either add scripts/build-risk-coverage.py to the bundle or replace the CI example's invocation with the concrete grep/depth logic the body already describes, so the executable path is complete.
Spell out the validate→fix→retry loop after the Step 8 CI gate (e.g., 'on failure: triage the orphan risk, add coverage or accept the risk, then re-run the gate') to make the recovery path explicit.
Trim the Overview Wikipedia quote to a one-line framing so the body leans even more on Claude's existing RBT knowledge.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: tight tables, a fill-in matrix template, and lean 'see references/…' pointers assume Claude's competence. Not 5 because the Overview's Wikipedia quote and some framing prose are mild padding that could be trimmed; not 3 because the body is largely lean rather than noticeably verbose. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: a full markdown risk-matrix template, a concrete grep command for risk tags, and a CI YAML gate. Not 5 because the CI example invokes scripts/build-risk-coverage.py, which is not present in the bundle, leaving one executable path unresolved. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Steps 1–8 sequence with explicit validation in Step 8 (orphan detection, CI fail-on-orphan-score gate). Not 5 because the validate→fix→retry loop is implicit (the gate 'fails if' but the recovery steps are not spelled out); not 3 because checkpoints are genuinely present rather than missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview in SKILL.md with a well-signaled one-level-deep 'Going deeper' routing table; all six referenced files exist and content is appropriately split (heavyweight methods, calibration, storming, registers, checklist all live in references/). Not 4 because navigation and file split are clean with no nesting or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |