Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured reference skill with executable SQL, a validated multi-step workflow, and clean progressive disclosure into real bundle files. Minor tightening of explanatory prose and an explicit test-failure retry loop would raise it further.
Suggestions
Tighten the Overview and Worked example prose and drop redundant 'Per Postgres docs' lead-ins to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit 'if a cross-tenant test passes unexpectedly, revise the policy and re-run' retry step to the workflow to close the validation loop.
Consider inlining a one-line TOC mapping each body section to its reference file so navigation is even more discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean — tables, code blocks, and targeted patterns with no basic-concept padding — but the Overview and Worked example prose, plus repeated 'Per Postgres docs' framing, could be trimmed slightly without losing value. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready SQL throughout — ALTER TABLE ENABLE/FORCE, a full CREATE POLICY ... USING/WITH CHECK example, statement-level test queries with expected failure messages, and a Bad/Good auth.uid() snippet — covers the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step 'How to use' is clearly sequenced with a validation checkpoint (step 6: 'assert cross-tenant reads and writes fail') and an anti-patterns checklist (step 7), but an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for a failed test is implied rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is a true overview pointing one level deep to real, topic-split bundle files (create-policy-syntax.md, tenant-context-patterns.md, policy-and-bypass-patterns.md, other-engines.md and its per-engine peers), all verified present and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |