CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/sbom-formats

Reference for the two SBOM specification families and how to choose between them - CycloneDX v1.6 (OWASP-curated, security-focused: components, services, dependencies, first-class vulnerabilities[] with embedded VEX, formulation, ML/SaaS BOMs; XML / JSON / Protobuf) as the primary format, with SPDX 2.3 + 3.0 (Linux Foundation, license-focused: packages, relationships, license expressions, Tag-Value/JSON encodings, ISO/IEC 5962:2021) covered as a reference. Includes per-language generators, schema validation, sign + attest CI wiring, and the format-choice guidance (CycloneDX for security-focused consumers; SPDX for US Federal procurement, Linux Foundation, and license-compliance contexts). Use when the user asks to write or validate an SBOM in CycloneDX or SPDX form, or the team must pick its SBOM format.

72

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.md

name:
sbom-formats
description:
Reference for the two SBOM specification families and how to choose between them - CycloneDX v1.6 (OWASP-curated, security-focused: components, services, dependencies, first-class vulnerabilities[] with embedded VEX, formulation, ML/SaaS BOMs; XML / JSON / Protobuf) as the primary format, with SPDX 2.3 + 3.0 (Linux Foundation, license-focused: packages, relationships, license expressions, Tag-Value/JSON encodings, ISO/IEC 5962:2021) covered as a reference. Includes per-language generators, schema validation, sign + attest CI wiring, and the format-choice guidance (CycloneDX for security-focused consumers; SPDX for US Federal procurement, Linux Foundation, and license-compliance contexts). Use when the user asks to write or validate an SBOM in CycloneDX or SPDX form, or the team must pick its SBOM format.

sbom-formats

Overview

Two specification families dominate the SBOM landscape. CycloneDX is the OWASP-curated, security-focused format and this skill's primary subject; SPDX is the Linux Foundation's license-focused standard, covered in references/spdx.md.

Per cyclonedx.org/specification/overview, CycloneDX's distinguishing features vs SPDX:

  • Vulnerability schema - first-class vulnerabilities[] block with VEX-style status assertions
  • Services + dataflow - services[] block describes service endpoints + data flows
  • Formulation - describes how the software was built (build steps, tools, env)
  • ML BOMs (CycloneDX 1.5+) - first-class ML model + dataset components
  • SaaS BOMs - describes hosted services not just shipped artifacts

This is a reference skill - defines the schemas + tooling landscape; doesn't run scans. Pair with syft-generation to generate SBOMs in either format from real codebases.

Choosing a format

SignalPick
Security-focused consumer (vuln tracking, supply-chain attestation)CycloneDX
US Federal procurement (NIST SP 800-218 + EO 14028 guidance)SPDX (references/spdx.md)
License-compliance focus (richest license-expression vocabulary)SPDX
Linux Foundation member organization workflowSPDX
EU consumers / broad modern toolingCycloneDX (most common)
Consumer dictates the formatWhatever the consumer requires

When no consumer constraint exists, CycloneDX is the default here: its embedded VEX (vulnerabilities[].analysis) feeds the triage workflow directly. Generating both (Syft emits either) satisfies mixed audiences. Note SPDX license IDs are the cross-format standard - even CycloneDX license blocks use them.

When to use

  • The team adopts CycloneDX as the primary SBOM format, or must pick a format (see Choosing a format).
  • The use case is security-focused (vuln tracking, supply-chain attestation) over licensing-focused.
  • A consumer (vendor, customer, regulator) requires CycloneDX or SPDX format specifically (SPDX: references/spdx.md).
  • Per-language CycloneDX-native tooling is preferred over Syft+convert.

How to use

Work the numbered Steps in order: generate the BOM (Steps 1-2), add a VEX-style analysis record per triaged finding (Steps 3, 5), validate against the schema (Step 4), then sign + attest in CI (Step 6). Pin the specVersion your consumer agreed; bump version on each re-issue. For an SPDX consumer, follow references/spdx.md instead.

Step 1 - Top-level structure

A minimal CycloneDX 1.6 BOM (JSON):

{
  "$schema": "http://cyclonedx.org/schema/bom-1.6.schema.json",
  "bomFormat": "CycloneDX",
  "specVersion": "1.6",
  "serialNumber": "urn:uuid:3e671687-395b-41f5-a30f-a58921a69b79",
  "version": 1,
  "metadata": {
    "timestamp": "2026-05-06T12:00:00Z",
    "tools": [{"vendor": "anchore", "name": "syft", "version": "1.16.0"}],
    "component": {
      "type": "application",
      "name": "my-app",
      "version": "1.0.0",
      "purl": "pkg:generic/my-app@1.0.0"
    }
  },
  "components": [
    {
      "type": "library",
      "bom-ref": "pkg:npm/lodash@4.17.20",
      "name": "lodash",
      "version": "4.17.20",
      "purl": "pkg:npm/lodash@4.17.20",
      "licenses": [{"license": {"id": "MIT"}}]
    }
  ],
  "dependencies": [
    {
      "ref": "pkg:generic/my-app@1.0.0",
      "dependsOn": ["pkg:npm/lodash@4.17.20"]
    }
  ]
}

Step 2 - Required fields per spec

Per cdx-spec:

FieldRequired?Use
bomFormatyesMust be "CycloneDX"
specVersionyes"1.6" (current) / "1.5" / "1.4"
serialNumberrecommendedURN UUID identifying the BOM
versionrecommendedBOM revision (incremented per re-issue)
metadatarecommendedGeneration context (timestamp, tools, top-level component)
components[]required for non-empty BOMsInventory of dependencies
dependencies[]recommendedDependency-graph edges via bom-ref
services[]optionalHosted services (SaaS BOM)
vulnerabilities[]optionalPer-finding records
formulation[]optionalBuild metadata

Component types and per-language native generators are cataloged in references/component-types-and-tooling.md; the purl (Package URL) field is the canonical component identifier.

Step 3 - Vulnerability block (VEX-equivalent)

CycloneDX has first-class vuln support (unlike SPDX which delegates to companion files):

"vulnerabilities": [
  {
    "id": "CVE-2024-1234",
    "source": {"name": "NVD", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1234"},
    "ratings": [
      {"source": {"name": "NVD"}, "severity": "critical", "method": "CVSSv3", "score": 9.8}
    ],
    "cwes": [798],
    "description": "Hardcoded credential in lodash sortBy function",
    "affects": [{"ref": "pkg:npm/lodash@4.17.20"}],
    "analysis": {
      "state": "not_affected",
      "justification": "code_not_present",
      "detail": "Vulnerable function not exported in current build"
    }
  }
]

The analysis.state field uses VEX-equivalent values: resolved, resolved_with_pedigree, exploitable, in_triage, false_positive, not_affected.

Step 4 - Validation

Validate a CycloneDX SBOM against the schema:

# Using cyclonedx-cli
cyclonedx validate --input-file sbom.json --input-version v1_6

# Or via npm
npx @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-bom validate sbom.json

Validation catches structural issues (missing required fields, invalid PURLs, unknown component types) before publishing. For SPDX validation (pyspdxtools), see references/spdx.md.

Step 5 - VEX integration

The Step 3 vulnerabilities[] record IS embedded VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability Exchange, CycloneDX 1.4+). To assert a triaged CVE does not affect the shipped product, extend that same record - deltas only:

  • analysis.justification: "vulnerable_code_not_in_execute_path" with a concrete analysis.detail (e.g. "vulnerable parser only invoked under --debug; production builds disable it").
  • analysis.response: ["will_not_fix"] - the planned action.

This lets downstream consumers filter the false-positive finding instead of re-doing reachability analysis.

Step 6 - CI integration

jobs:
  cyclonedx:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      # Per-language native (recommended for richer SBOM)
      - run: npx @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-npm --output-file=sbom.cyclonedx.json
      # OR via Syft (broader source coverage)
      - uses: anchore/sbom-action@v0
        with:
          format: cyclonedx-json
          output-file: sbom.cyclonedx.json
      # Validate
      - run: cyclonedx validate --input-file sbom.cyclonedx.json --input-version v1_6
      # Sign + attest
      - run: cosign attest --predicate sbom.cyclonedx.json --type cyclonedx my-image:1.0

Worked example

A Node.js service must ship a CycloneDX SBOM to a security-focused customer. The team:

  1. Generates the BOM natively: npx @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-npm --output-file=sbom.cyclonedx.json. Output is bomFormat: "CycloneDX", specVersion: "1.6", with a components[] entry per dependency (each carrying a purl) and a dependencies[] edge list.
  2. A scan flags CVE-2024-1234 on pkg:npm/lodash@4.17.20. Triage shows the vulnerable function is not in the execute path, so the team adds a vulnerabilities[] record with analysis.state: "not_affected" and justification: "vulnerable_code_not_in_execute_path" (Step 3).
  3. Validates: cyclonedx validate --input-file sbom.cyclonedx.json --input-version v1_6 - passes.
  4. Attests to the image: cosign attest --predicate sbom.cyclonedx.json --type cyclonedx my-image:1.0.

Result: a schema-valid, attested CycloneDX 1.6 BOM whose embedded VEX lets the customer drop the lodash finding without re-doing reachability analysis.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skip serialNumber fieldCan't deduplicate across re-generationsGenerate URN UUID per BOM
Use metadata.tools[] v1.4 schema in 1.6+Schema evolution; tools shape changedUse metadata.tools.components[] (newer schema)
Skip dependencies[] blockLoss of dep-graph info; downstream tools degradeAlways include (Step 1)
Hand-author CycloneDXSchema is large; errors easy to introduceUse generators (references)
Skip schema validationInvalid SBOMs pass into prod; downstream consumers failValidate in CI (Step 4)
Pick format by tooling habit, not consumerConsumer rejects the deliveryFormat-choice table (Choosing a format)

Limitations

  • Both specs are large + evolve; pin schema version per consumer agreement.
  • Per-language tools have varying quality; some are community-maintained
    • occasionally lag releases.
  • VEX assertions are only as good as the analysis behind them; unfounded not_affected claims are worse than no claim.
  • ML / SaaS BOM features are newer (CycloneDX 1.5+) and not all tooling supports them.
  • SPDX-specific limitations (weaker vuln support, strict license expressions, 3.0 tooling maturity) are in references/spdx.md.

References

  • cdx-spec - official CycloneDX specification
  • references/spdx.md - SPDX 2.3 + 3.0 format reference
  • references/component-types-and-tooling.md - CycloneDX component types + per-language native tooling
  • references/spdx3-profiles-and-tooling.md - SPDX 3.0 profiles + tooling landscape
  • cyclonedx.org - landing
  • github.com/CycloneDX - org with per-language tools
  • github.com/package-url/purl-spec - Package URL spec
  • openvex.dev - OpenVEX standalone spec (compatible with CycloneDX 1.4+ embedded VEX)
  • syft-generation, trivy-image, vex-author - sister tools

SKILL.md

tile.json