CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/soc2-evidence-collector

Build-an-X for SOC 2 Type II evidence collection - per-Trust-Services-Criterion test artifacts (Common Criteria CC1.1 - CC9.2; plus Availability A1, Confidentiality C1, Processing Integrity PI1, Privacy P1 - P9 if in scope); auto-collection from CI logs + audit trails + access logs + change-management records; alignment with Vanta / Drata / Secureframe evidence shapes; observation-period sampling. Use when the team is preparing for SOC 2 Type II audit and needs continuous evidence collection automation.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured build-an-X skill: lean and operational, with executable code, a sequenced workflow plus verification checkpoints, and appropriate one-level-deep reference splitting. Minor duplication of the 'Most SaaS engagements...' sentence between the body and the reference file is the only token-efficiency nit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — tables, executable code, and sequenced steps — and assumes Claude's competence; SOC 2 specifics (observation period, TSC scope) are legitimate domain context rather than basic concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides executable Python for both the collector and the per-control test, with the injected client interfaces (okta_client, aws_iam, github_org, slack) explicitly justified as thin SDK wrappers rather than left as pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Seven sequenced steps culminate in a checklist, with explicit verification (mock auditor query in Step 7), continuity-gap alerting in Step 6, and a worked example showing a test-fail → fix → green feedback loop for a batch operation.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Overview and code stay inline in SKILL.md while the large control-to-evidence-source and scope-decision tables are split into references/evidence-source-map.md — a real, one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (verified present).

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with concrete actions, natural trigger terms, an explicit Use-when clause, and a clear SOC 2 niche that avoids conflict. The only nit is the internal 'Build-an-X' jargon prefix, which does not materially weaken the trigger.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions: building per-criterion test artifacts, auto-collection from CI logs + audit trails + access logs + change-management records, GRC platform alignment, and observation-period sampling — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (per-criterion evidence collection with named sources and GRC alignment) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so it is not capped at 2.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when the team is preparing for SOC 2 Type II audit and needs continuous evidence collection automation' clause surfaces the natural terms a user would actually say (SOC 2 Type II audit, evidence collection, Vanta/Drata/Secureframe), giving good coverage despite the internal 'Build-an-X' jargon prefix.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped tightly to SOC 2 Type II evidence collection with distinct triggers (TSC criteria, Vanta/Drata/Secureframe, observation-period sampling), making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents