Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable, well-sequenced content with executable examples for both SDKs and strong validation guidance. The only weak dimension is progressive disclosure: most detail lives inline in a long SKILL.md with just one offloaded example file.
Suggestions
Move the detailed per-pattern sections (e.g., impression listener, impressionsMode, assignment integrity) into a dedicated references file and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview that links out, improving the progressive-disclosure split.
Consider extracting the anti-patterns table and limitations into a separate reference so the main body stays a lean orientation to the workflow.
Add a one-line 'Quick start' summary near the top that points to EXAMPLE.md for a runnable end-to-end case, front-loading the most useful single reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious, SDK-specific behavior (localhost mode, 'control' fallback semantics, impression listener object shape, Node-vs-JS getTreatment signatures, v10.7.0 YAML requirement) rather than explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, so the prose earns its place. It is not a 2 because there is no generic padding or library basics exposition. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready TypeScript for both the browser and Node.js SDKs, a YAML fixture, install command, CI workflow, impression listener wiring, and teardown — meeting the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced workflow (install → offline setup → await SDK_READY/whenReady → evaluate → verify impressions → destroy → CI) with explicit validation checkpoints (await whenReady before assertions, determinism checks) and an anti-patterns table acting as a failure-mode checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a ~260-line document keeping all detailed patterns inline, with only one well-signaled one-level reference (EXAMPLE.md, which exists). It matches the score-2 anchor of substantial inline content that could be split into separate reference files rather than the concise-overview-plus-multiple-references score-3 pattern. It is not a 1 because the single reference is clearly signaled and one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |