Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-structured, and sequenced with concrete code and a useful anti-patterns table. The main weakness is the exposure-event test, which is non-executable placeholder code lacking a real assertion.
Suggestions
Replace the exposure-event test placeholder with executable code that asserts an exposure event was recorded, or explicitly justify why a mock is required and show the mock setup.
Tighten the experiment example: `getExperiment` returns an object whose `.get()` / typed value semantics vary by SDK version, so either assert via the documented accessor or note the version being targeted.
The CI example pins `actions/checkout@v5` / `setup-node@v4`; consider noting these are illustrative majors to avoid implying a required fixed version.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: install, initialize, override, evaluate, integrity, exposure, running, CI, anti-patterns, limitations each earn their tokens without explaining Statsig concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Most examples are executable, but the exposure-event test is incomplete ('Inspect via test mock of the event-uploader' with no assertion) and the assertion `expect(exp.value).toEqual({ font_size: 20 })` is fragile, leaving gaps rather than copy-paste-ready code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Authoring steps are clearly sequenced (install → initialize → override → evaluate → integrity → exposure) with shutdown/CI integration and an anti-patterns checklist providing checkpoints; no destructive batch operation lacks guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill (~175 lines) with clear sections and a References block linking external docs and named sibling skills; appropriate for a skill needing no bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |