Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable body with concrete YAML, a worked example, and a precise output template. It loses a little on conciseness for a duplicated block-quote/schema restatement and on workflow clarity for lacking an explicit revise-and-re-run feedback loop.
Suggestions
Trim the verbatim principlesofchaos.org Principle 1 block-quote to a one-line paraphrase and drop the in-body restatement of tolerance-gate mechanics, since both are covered in the reference file.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the output/workflow section — e.g. after a FAIL verdict, revise the flagged probe and re-run the pre-flight checks until SOUND — to lift workflow clarity.
Consider moving the hard-reject table's per-check mapping into the reference file or a dedicated section to keep the main flow lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and well-structured, but the verbatim principlesofchaos.org Principle 1 block-quote and the in-body restatement of tolerance-gate mechanics (already detailed in the reference file) are mild redundancy that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready probe YAML, concrete pass/fail signals per check, specific diagnostic questions, and an exact output-format template with a fully worked example. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five checks are clearly sequenced with a hard-reject validation gate and per-probe verdict rows, but no explicit fix→re-validate feedback loop is formalized, which the feedback-loops guidance keeps below a clean 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference (references/chaostoolkit-tolerance.md, which exists and holds the promised schema/tolerance detail); content appropriately split with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |