Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear sequenced workflow and proper progressive disclosure into real reference files. The only weakness is mild token redundancy from a repeated long URL and a table duplicated between the body and a reference.
Suggestions
Keep the full OWASP WSTG-ATHZ-02 URL once in the References section; inline occurrences can use a short anchor link to avoid repeating the long verbatim URL.
In Step 2, retain only the three OWASP scenarios inline and defer the tenant-isolation-specific patterns entirely to references/attack-patterns.md to remove the duplicated table.
Consider trimming rarely-tenant-bearing rows from the Step 1 surface-category table, or moving the exhaustive list into a reference, to tighten the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and competent, but not every token earns its place: the long OWASP WSTG-ATHZ-02 URL is repeated verbatim three times and the Step 2 attack-pattern summary table duplicates content already in references/attack-patterns.md. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides an executable minimal Python probe, concrete grep commands ('grep -r "tenant_id" --include="*.sql"'), a framework-selection table, and real copy-paste-ready batteries in the reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 (coverage matrix with 'Empty cells are coverage gaps the PR must justify') plus an anti-patterns checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references (references/attack-patterns.md, references/framework-skeletons.md), both of which exist as real bundle files with the promised detailed content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |