Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable test-authoring skill: lean body, concrete code/naming/fixtures, a sequenced workflow with verification checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into three real reference files. No concept-teaching padding or deep reference nesting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence and never explains basic concepts (what a tenant is, what a test framework is); every section earns its place — naming convention, fixtures table, framework table, coverage matrix, anti-patterns, worked example. It is detailed but not padded. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: a strict test_<surface>_<scenario>_<expected>() naming convention, a required-fixtures table, a stack-to-framework table, a populated coverage matrix template, and a worked example with a copy-ready assertion (TenantQuota.objects.filter(tenant=new_tenant).count() == 1). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 5-step workflow (map surfaces -> enumerate scenarios -> generate cases -> emit skeleton -> build matrix) with validation checkpoints: empty matrix cells 'must justify or schedule', run as a non-privileged app role, and cross-check the Anti-patterns table. The worked example demonstrates the verify loop (assertion passes -> matrix cell flips to X). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that delegates detail to three real, one-level-deep, clearly-signaled references (provisioning-surface-map.md, provisioning-test-scenarios.md, test-skeleton-examples.md), all of which exist in ./references/. Content is appropriately split with easy navigation; no nested reference chains. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |