Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable audit methodology: concrete thresholds, per-axis band tables, a baseline gate, an explicit rollup and fix-order, and a complete output template, with the worked example correctly offloaded to a real one-level reference. Its only weakness is length and some redundancy (the Sources index, repeated framing) that pull conciseness below the top anchor.
Suggestions
Remove or shrink the 'Sources' index section — every citation already appears inline at the claim it supports, so the index repeats information without adding value.
Consolidate the repeated 'is a practitioner convention, not a published number' framing into a single statement near the rollup rather than restating it verbatim under each axis.
Tighten the 'What this owns, and what it does not' boundary table; the distinctiveness point is already made in the description, so the body version can be shortened to the suite-vs-framework distinction alone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most lines earn their place as concrete thresholds and citations, but at ~440 lines the body is long and carries redundancy — the closing 'Sources' index restates the inline citations, and the ownership/boundary and repeated 'convention of this audit' framing could be tightened, placing it at 'mostly efficient but could be tighter' rather than 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete and copy-ready throughout: explicit numeric cuts (90%/70%, depth 2/3/4, 1:10 ratio, 20% adoption, 80%/50%, retry >2), per-axis band tables, and a full Markdown output template with exact field placeholders — the top anchor for actionable instruction guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced — a 'Before scoring' baseline gate (A1 pattern, A7 conventions doc), per-axis measurement, an explicit rollup rule (any FAIL→FAIL, else any WARN→WARN, else PASS), a blast-radius fix order, and a fixed output template — with checkpoints; the read-only audit is not destructive so the feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body keeps the methodology inline and signals one clearly-named one-level-deep reference for the worked example and anti-pattern table ('A full worked audit... in references/audit-detail.md'), and that file exists in references/, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |