Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable audit skill: every axis has measurable thresholds, cited grounding, and an enforced output format with conventions made explicit. The main costs are recurring justification prose that inflates token budget and a couple of underspecified procedural details (inventory construction, A7 sampling).
Suggestions
Condense the per-axis convention-justification paragraphs to one or two lines each (the full reasoning already lives implicitly in the output's conventions section, which requires printing the cut and value); this would cut substantial tokens without losing the thresholds.
Add a short opening step describing how to build the inventory (which directories to walk, what counts as a test file vs a helper module) since the output template requires counts the procedure never gathers.
Specify the A7 sampling method (e.g. how many test bodies to sample and how to choose them) so the "share of sampled test bodies" measurement is reproducible across audits.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with load-bearing content (band tables, thresholds, output template), but each of the eight axes carries a multi-paragraph convention-justification (e.g. "The reasoning is blast radius, and it is arithmetic rather than taste", "That is not drift, it is fiction") plus boundary-setting prose that could be condensed without losing the cuts. It is mostly efficient but noticeably tightenable, which matches anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every axis has exact band thresholds, concrete detection patterns (`page.waitForTimeout(...)`, `cy.wait(2000)`, `expect(await locator.isVisible()).toBe(true)` vs `await expect(locator).toBeVisible()`), and the skill closes with a copy-paste output template spelling out every field. As an instruction-only skill its guidance is fully concrete and covers the common runner cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (baseline preconditions → per-axis measurement → rollup rule → fix order → output template) with self-checking guards such as "state which pattern you assumed" and emitting `n/a` when no conventions doc exists. Minor gaps keep it at anchor 4: the inventory the output requires is never built by an explicit step, and A7's "share of sampled test bodies" leaves the sampling method unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single clearly-signaled reference (`references/audit-detail.md`) is verified to exist, is one level deep with no nested references, and appropriately offloads the worked example and anti-pattern table. Section headers per axis plus the output template make the 460-line body easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |