CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/test-framework-blueprint

Build-an-X workflow that takes an SDET from no test suite to a complete framework design in seven steps - inventory the SUT, choose runner + language, directory layout + fixture architecture, object-model decision, test data + mocking wiring, reporting + CI integration, conventions doc + review gates - producing a written framework blueprint (directory tree, fixture list, chosen patterns, CI matrix) plus an implementation order. This is the whole-framework design workflow - not the Step 2 runner-choice decision on its own, not the Step 4 object-model pattern catalog it defers to, and not the scaffolder that generates the harness skeleton once the blueprint exists. Use when designing a test automation framework from scratch or re-architecting one that grew organically.

79

Quality

99%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly sequenced seven-step design workflow with concrete decision outputs per step, actionable tables and config snippets, an anti-patterns table, and well-structured offloading of mechanics and the full worked example to real one-level-deep reference files. It respects token budget while staying actionable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is information-dense decision guidance that does not re-explain basics Claude already knows; rationale sentences like "nobody fixes flake they cannot read" earn their place rather than padding, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete tables (inventory items, fixture scopes, object-model patterns), a directory tree, and copy-ready config ("reporter: [['junit', { outputFile: 'results.xml' }]]", "npx playwright test --shard=1/4") give specific executable guidance; per the scoring note, an instruction/design skill without inline test code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Seven steps are clearly sequenced and each ends in an explicit "Decision output" checkpoint, with anti-patterns and a Step 7 enforcement/review loop; the destructive-operations cap does not apply to this design workflow, so it clears the top anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A concise overview points to two clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference files ([references/fixture-mechanics.md], [references/worked-example.md]), both of which exist in the bundle, with inline deferrals to sister catalogs — matching the well-signaled-one-level-deep anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive: it enumerates concrete steps and outputs, gives an explicit Use-when trigger, and proactively separates itself from sibling skills. Voice is appropriately third-person and there is no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions across all seven steps ("inventory the SUT", "choose runner + language", "directory layout + fixture architecture", "reporting + CI integration") and the concrete artifacts produced ("directory tree, fixture list, chosen patterns, CI matrix" plus "an implementation order"), matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (a build-an-X workflow producing a written framework blueprint plus an implementation order) and when (the "Use when..." clause), satisfying the top anchor; not level 2 since "when" is explicit, not implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when designing a test automation framework from scratch or re-architecting one that grew organically" clause supplies natural phrases a user would actually say; not the level-2 anchor because it covers both greenfield and re-architecture triggers rather than a single keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Explicit carve-outs ("not the Step 2 runner-choice decision on its own, not the Step 4 object-model pattern catalog it defers to, and not the scaffolder") give it a clear niche unlikely to trigger the wrong skill, matching the distinct-triggers anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents