Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, well-structured reference catalog with executable code, concrete heuristics, and a clearly sequenced review workflow. It keeps detail that would bloat the spine in a single properly-signaled reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean reference catalog - tables, code blocks, and rule heuristics with no preamble explaining concepts Claude already knows (no "what is a test step" intro). Every line teaches a rule or shows a smell/refactor pair, so each token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript blocks for both bad (mechanical-layer) and good (business-layer) tests, plus specific numeric heuristics (>15 actions, 5+ mechanical lines, 3+ tests) that a reviewer can apply directly. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How to use" section gives a clear seven-step sequenced audit process with explicit checkpoints - counting actions, the single-purpose split rule, the rule-of-three extraction, and a final "reader test" validation step - and the worked example walks through applying them in order. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md spine summarizes Patterns 5 and 6 and points to a single one-level-deep reference (references/step-grouping-and-phrasing.md) that exists and holds the full tables/code, with clear "Full ...: [references/...]" signaling. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |