Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, executable skill: code-first Steps 1-9, a real validation/feedback loop in Step 1, and a single well-signaled one-level reference that absorbs the bulky assertion/mock catalog. No concept over-explanation, no pseudocode, no deep reference chains.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence: no preamble explaining what unittest or testing is, every section is a runnable code block or a one-line rule. It pushes the assertion/mock catalog out to a reference rather than inlining it, so tokens earn their place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Every step ships executable, copy-paste-ready code or commands — e.g. Step 1's full `test_sum.py` plus `python -m unittest test_sum.py`, the worked `@patch('greeting.fetch_user')` example, and `python -m unittest discover -s tests/ -p 'test_*.py'`. Not level 2: no pseudocode or missing key details. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-9 give a clear sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop: 'a passing run ends with `OK`... If it prints `FAILED (failures=N)`, read the `AssertionError` diff... re-run until you get `OK` before adding more tests.' Not level 2, which lacks explicit checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Spine is an overview with a single one-level-deep, well-signaled reference (Steps 3 & 4 point to `references/assertions-and-mock.md`, verified present); the reference holds the heavy catalog so the body stays tight. Easy navigation, no nested/deep references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |