testland/vector-search-recall-tests

Vector search benchmarking - recall@k vs latency tradeoffs, ground-truth construction via brute-force, HNSW tuning (M / ef_construct / ef per Qdrant docs), embedding-model-upgrade drift detection. Use ANN-Benchmarks framework for cross-engine comparison; per-engine clients (Qdrant, Weaviate, pgvector, Pinecone, Elasticsearch k-NN, Milvus) for in-product tests. Use when HNSW / IVF parameters are being tuned or an embedding model is swapped, and recall@k on the existing corpus has never been measured against brute-force ground truth.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

name:: vector-search-recall-tests
description:: Vector search benchmarking - recall@k vs latency tradeoffs, ground-truth construction via brute-force, HNSW tuning (M / ef_construct / ef per Qdrant docs), embedding-model-upgrade drift detection. Use ANN-Benchmarks framework for cross-engine comparison; per-engine clients (Qdrant, Weaviate, pgvector, Pinecone, Elasticsearch k-NN, Milvus) for in-product tests. Use when HNSW / IVF parameters are being tuned or an embedding model is swapped, and recall@k on the existing corpus has never been measured against brute-force ground truth.
metadata:: {"keywords":"vector-search, ann-benchmarks, hnsw, recall-at-k, embedding-drift"}

vector-search-recall-tests

Name: testland/vector-search-recall-tests
Rating: 72 (1 reviews)
Author: testland

Per the ANN-Benchmarks docs and Qdrant search docs, tests must measure recall@k against known ground truth - engine self-eval doesn't catch index corruption or parameter drift.

When to use

Production uses vector search for retrieval (RAG, semantic search, recommendations).
HNSW / IVF / ScaNN parameter tuning - need quantitative test for the recall/latency Pareto curve.
Embedding model upgrade - verify recall doesn't drop on the existing corpus.

Step 1 - Construct ground truth (brute-force k-NN)

Ground truth = top-k closest documents under exact (brute-force) distance. Compute once for a fixed query set:

import numpy as np
from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors

def compute_ground_truth(corpus_vectors, query_vectors, k=10):
    nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=k, algorithm="brute", metric="cosine")
    nn.fit(corpus_vectors)
    distances, indices = nn.kneighbors(query_vectors)
    return indices  # shape (n_queries, k)

Save indices alongside corpus + queries; recompute only if corpus or embedding model changes.

Step 2 - Recall@k measurement

def recall_at_k(retrieved_ids, ground_truth_ids):
    """Both: list of doc-id arrays, length n_queries; each row top-k retrieved."""
    recalls = []
    for retr, gt in zip(retrieved_ids, ground_truth_ids):
        recalls.append(len(set(retr) & set(gt)) / len(gt))
    return float(np.mean(recalls))

For a given engine + parameter set, retrieve via the engine's API, then compute recall@k. Typical target: recall@10 ≥ 0.95 for production search.

Step 3 - HNSW parameter sweep

Per Qdrant search docs, HNSW tunables:

Parameter	Effect	Tradeoff
`M`	Connections per node in the graph	Higher M = better recall + larger index size
`ef_construct`	Build-time search width	Higher = better recall + slower indexing
`ef`	Query-time search width	Higher = better recall + slower queries

Per Qdrant search docs: "Increasing ef and ef_construct improves recall but increases computational latency."

Sweep, using the real Qdrant client. Per the Qdrant search docs, ef (a.k.a. hnsw_ef) is a query-time parameter passed in SearchParams, so the sweep just varies it per call:

from qdrant_client import QdrantClient, models

client = QdrantClient(url="http://localhost:6333")
COLLECTION = "docs"  # points upserted with id == corpus index (to match ground truth)

def qdrant_search(query_vec, ef, k=10):
    # exact=False keeps the query on the HNSW path; exact=True is the oracle.
    resp = client.query_points(
        collection_name=COLLECTION,
        query=query_vec,
        search_params=models.SearchParams(hnsw_ef=ef, exact=False),
        limit=k,
        with_payload=False,
    )
    return [p.id for p in resp.points]

ef_values = [16, 32, 64, 128, 256]
results = []
for ef in ef_values:
    retrieved = [qdrant_search(q, ef=ef, k=10) for q in query_vectors]
    recall = recall_at_k(retrieved, ground_truth)
    results.append({"ef": ef, "recall": recall})
    # Pair with measure_latency() from Step 4 to capture p95 at this ef.

# Find smallest ef that hits the recall target.
for r in results:
    if r["recall"] >= 0.95:
        print(f"smallest ef hitting target: ef={r['ef']} -> recall {r['recall']:.3f}")
        break

Other engines expose ef differently - e.g. Weaviate v4 sets it at the collection level (vectorIndexConfig), not per query, so the sweep updates the config between rounds. Per-engine client code (Weaviate) and version-specific API notes: references/per-engine-clients.md.

Step 4 - Latency p50 / p95 / p99 budget

Recall-only is a trap. Pair with latency:

import time

def measure_latency(queries, engine_search_fn):
    times = []
    for q in queries:
        t0 = time.perf_counter()
        engine_search_fn(q, k=10)
        times.append((time.perf_counter() - t0) * 1000)
    times.sort()
    return {
        "p50": times[len(times) // 2],
        "p95": times[int(len(times) * 0.95)],
        "p99": times[int(len(times) * 0.99)],
    }

def test_latency_under_budget():
    lat = measure_latency(queries, qdrant_search)
    assert lat["p95"] < 50, f"p95 {lat['p95']:.1f}ms exceeds 50ms budget"

Step 5 - Embedding-model drift test

Embedding model upgrade (text-embedding-3-small → -3-large) = all vectors invalidated. Test the new corpus's ground truth:

def test_recall_holds_after_embedding_upgrade():
    # Pre-upgrade baseline
    old_recall = baseline_recall_for("text-embedding-3-small")

    # Re-embed corpus + queries
    new_corpus = embed_with("text-embedding-3-large")
    new_queries = embed_with("text-embedding-3-large")
    new_gt = compute_ground_truth(new_corpus, new_queries)

    # Re-build vector index
    rebuild_index(new_corpus)

    # Measure
    new_recall = recall_at_k(retrieve_topk(new_queries, k=10), new_gt)
    delta = new_recall - old_recall
    # Allow up to 5% recall drop on engineering basis; flag if larger
    assert delta >= -0.05, f"Recall dropped {delta:.3f} after embedding upgrade"

The brute-force ground-truth is per-model. After upgrade, both sides of the comparison change.

Step 6 - Cross-engine baseline (ANN-Benchmarks)

Per the ANN-Benchmarks docs, the framework "evaluates 37+ ANN algorithms ... by plotting recall against queries per second across various datasets" (HNSW, FAISS IVF, ScaNN, Annoy, Qdrant, Weaviate, Milvus). Use it to pick an engine + initial parameter set before the in-product sweep. Clone-and-run commands: references/ann-benchmarks.md.

Step 7 - Filter tests

Vector search + filter (e.g., "find similar products WHERE price < 50") interacts in surprising ways: pre-filter shrinks the search space (good for recall, sometimes bad for latency), post-filter rebuilds top-k after filtering (recall drops below K).

def test_filtered_search_recall():
    # Filter: only docs with category=shoes
    filter_fn = lambda doc: doc["category"] == "shoes"
    filtered_corpus = [v for v, d in zip(corpus_vectors, corpus_metadata) if filter_fn(d)]
    filtered_gt = compute_ground_truth(filtered_corpus, query_vectors)

    retrieved = engine_search(query_vectors, filter={"category": "shoes"}, k=10)
    recall = recall_at_k(retrieved, filtered_gt)
    assert recall >= 0.90

Pre-filter vs post-filter strategy matters per engine - see engine docs.

Step 8 - Index rebuild vs incremental

Some engines (Qdrant, Weaviate) support online updates; others (some FAISS configurations) require full rebuild on insert. Test:

def test_recall_after_incremental_inserts():
    # Initial index
    initial_recall = recall_at_k(engine_search(queries, k=10), ground_truth)

    # Insert 10% more docs
    for v, m in new_docs:
        engine.insert(v, m)

    # Re-measure (without rebuild)
    new_recall = recall_at_k(engine_search(queries, k=10), ground_truth_extended)
    assert new_recall >= initial_recall - 0.05

Some engines degrade significantly without periodic rebuild - catch in test.

Anti-patterns

Anti-pattern	Why it fails	Fix
Use cosine on un-normalized vectors	Distance becomes meaningless	Normalize OR use inner-product metric
Skip ground truth (rely on engine self-eval)	Can't catch index corruption	Brute-force ground truth (Step 1)
Test recall-only or latency-only	Either alone is gameable	Both per parameter (Steps 2-4)
Hard-code `ef=128` without sweep	Over-tuned for one query set	Sweep + pick per recall target (Step 3)
Reuse ground truth across embedding-model upgrades	Different vector space; nonsense recall	Recompute (Step 5)

Limitations

Brute-force ground truth is O(N×Q) - feasible to ~1M docs × 1k queries. Beyond, sample.
Recall@10 ≥ 0.95 is the hand-wavy default; production requirements vary widely (medical search vs e-commerce).
ANN-Benchmarks uses synthetic datasets (GloVe, SIFT, GIST); in-domain corpora behave differently.

References

ANN-Benchmarks docs - cross-engine recall/QPS curves
Qdrant search docs - query_points + SearchParams(hnsw_ef=...), HNSW parameters (M, ef_construct, ef), recall vs latency tradeoff
Weaviate Python client docs - v4 near_vector query and the collection-level ef (Reconfigure.VectorIndex.hnsw) config
elasticsearch-relevance-tests, opensearch-relevance-tests - classic IR-metrics relevance tests for term-based retrieval

.tessl-plugin

references

SKILL.md

tile.json