testland/visual-diff-summarizer
Builds a per-PR visual-diff summary that clusters intentional vs incidental changes across snapshots emitted by Percy, Chromatic, Playwright `toHaveScreenshot`, Storybook test-runner, and other visual testing tools - groups diffs by component / route, separates "intent-aligned with PR scope" from "cascade / regression suspect", surfaces baseline-update recommendations, and emits a single PR comment that points the reviewer at the screenshots that need actual eyes. Use when a PR has 20+ visual diffs and the reviewer needs help triaging which ones to actually open.
74
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow ingests runtime-generated diff data from external visual-test providers (e.g., Chromatic via `npx chromatic --dry-run --json` and Percy via build APIs described in `references/tool-outputs.md`), which can be influenced by outsiders and is free-text/JSON-derived content that the script will place into the LLM-visible report context.
- Audited
- Security analysis