Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient testing skill: lean prose, executable ws/Playwright examples, a sequenced Step 1-6 workflow with assertion-based validation, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure into a real references file. Minor formatting roughness in the trailing references list does not materially detract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence - it never explains what WebSocket is or how the libraries work, and every section earns its place with code or a lookup table; not level 2 because there is no padded explanatory prose, only minor redundancy in repeated 'Per [RFC 6455]' citations. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready test code using real APIs (ws upgrade/pong handlers, Playwright page.on('websocket')) with concrete assertions like 'expect(msg.statusCode).toBe(101)' and 'expect(ws.protocol).toBe("chat-v2")'; not level 2 because the examples are complete runnable tests, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 1-6 flow where each test's assertions act as validation checkpoints, augmented by an anti-patterns checklist and an explicit 'Verify: ... if it is 1006 ... fix the server shutdown path' feedback loop in the referenced recipes; not level 2 because validation is explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body keeps the core recipes inline and clearly signals one-level-deep detail ('The close-frame status-code matrix ... are in references/websocket-test-recipes.md'), and that referenced file exists and contains the promised close-code and backpressure material; not level 2 because navigation is explicit and content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |