CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

testland/zap-baseline

Configures and runs OWASP ZAP baseline scanning: `zap-baseline.py` Docker-packaged spider + passive scan suitable for CI gating; supports `-t target_url` + `-r html_report` + `-c config_file` rule customization (INFO/IGNORE/FAIL warnings) and Ajax spider via `-j` for JS-heavy SPAs; `zap-full-scan.py` active companion for staging. Covers authenticated scans end to end as a reference - ZAP Context, auth methods (form/JSON/script/browser), session management, verification strategy, OAuth/bearer injection, context XML export for `-n` - plus DAST cadence planning (PR-blocking passive baseline, nightly ZAP full + nuclei active layer, baseline-finding ratchet for legacy apps). Use when the user runs OWASP ZAP for pre-prod web app DAST, needs coverage of routes behind a login wall, or is designing a team's DAST rollout cadence.

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files
name:
zap-baseline
description:
Configures and runs OWASP ZAP baseline scanning: `zap-baseline.py` Docker-packaged spider + passive scan suitable for CI gating; supports `-t target_url` + `-r html_report` + `-c config_file` rule customization (INFO/IGNORE/FAIL warnings) and Ajax spider via `-j` for JS-heavy SPAs; `zap-full-scan.py` active companion for staging. Covers authenticated scans end to end as a reference - ZAP Context, auth methods (form/JSON/script/browser), session management, verification strategy, OAuth/bearer injection, context XML export for `-n` - plus DAST cadence planning (PR-blocking passive baseline, nightly ZAP full + nuclei active layer, baseline-finding ratchet for legacy apps). Use when the user runs OWASP ZAP for pre-prod web app DAST, needs coverage of routes behind a login wall, or is designing a team's DAST rollout cadence.

zap-baseline

Overview

Per zaproxy.org/docs/docker/baseline-scan/:

"The ZAP Baseline scan is a script that is available in the ZAP Docker images. It runs the ZAP spider against the specified target for (by default) 1 minute and then waits for the passive scanning to complete before reporting the results."

The baseline scan is passive only - non-intrusive, safe for production. The companion zap-full-scan.py adds active scanning (injection probes, XSS payloads) and is NOT safe for production; reserve for staging.

When to use

  • The repo deploys a web app + needs pre-prod DAST gate.
  • A CI workflow needs a non-intrusive scan that's safe to point at a deployed staging environment.
  • The team uses OWASP ZAP (de facto OSS DAST) over commercial alternatives.
  • The app's interesting routes sit behind a login wall (references/auth.md).
  • The team is designing its DAST rollout cadence from scratch (references/cadence.md).

Step 1 - Install

ZAP baseline runs from the official Docker image - no host install needed. Per zap-base:

docker pull ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable

Image variants:

TagUse
:stableProduction-grade; pin in CI
:weeklyLatest features; for evaluation
:bareHeadless minimal; smallest

Step 2 - First baseline scan

Per zap-base (verbatim):

docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable zap-baseline.py \
    -t https://www.example.com -r testreport.html

The -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw mount makes the report writable to the host directory. The report file lands at ./testreport.html after the scan.

Step 3 - Common flags

Per zap-base:

FlagUse
-t URLTarget URL (required)
-r FILEHTML report output
-w FILEMarkdown report
-x FILEXML report
-J FILEJSON report (for finding triage)
-c FILEConfig file: rule INFO/IGNORE/FAIL behavior
-P PORTSpecify ZAP listen port
-jUse Ajax spider in addition to traditional spider (JS-heavy apps)
-m MINSSpider duration in minutes (default 1)
-dShow debug messages
-IDon't return failure on warning (gate softly)
-n CONTEXT_FILEAuthenticated scan context file

Step 4 - Authenticated scans

For apps requiring login, export a ZAP context file from the GUI (Sites → right-click → Export Context). The context file encodes:

  • Auth method (form / script / HTTP / OAuth)
  • Login URL + creds (referenced env vars; never hardcode)
  • Session-management strategy
  • Logged-in / logged-out indicators

Building that context from scratch - choosing the auth method, wiring session management, calibrating verification indicators, CSRF and OAuth/bearer handling - is walked end to end in references/auth.md. Then:

docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw \
  -e ZAP_AUTH_USERNAME=$USER \
  -e ZAP_AUTH_PASSWORD=$PASS \
  -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable \
  zap-baseline.py -t https://app.example.com -n /zap/wrk/context.xml -J report.json

Step 5 - Active scan companion (zap-full-scan.py)

For staging-only deeper analysis:

docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable \
  zap-full-scan.py -t https://staging.example.com -J report.json

zap-full-scan.py triggers active payloads (SQLi probes, XSS, SSRF). NEVER point at production - risk of data corruption + generates audit-log noise.

Step 6 - False-positive triage (MANDATORY)

Per zap-base, rule customization via -c config_file where each line is <rule_id>\t<INFO|WARN|IGNORE|FAIL>\t<URL_pattern>:

Example zap-config.tsv:

10049	IGNORE	*	# Cookie No HttpOnly: legacy session cookie; tracked in JIRA-1234
40012	WARN	https://app.example.com/admin/*	# XSS: legacy admin pages; not exposed to users
10063	FAIL	*	# Permissions Policy: must be set on all responses

Three suppression layers:

MechanismExampleWhen to use
Per-rule config TSV<rule_id>\tIGNORE\t*Rule disabled globally
Per-URL pattern<rule_id>\tWARN\thttps://app/admin/*Rule downgraded for known-old code path
Context exclusion<exclude_from_context> in context XMLWhole URL trees out of scope
-I flagzap-baseline.py -I ...Soft gate: warns but exits 0

Justification template (mandatory in config):

# Rule 10049 (Cookie No HttpOnly)
# Suppressed: 2026-05-15 by alice@example.com
# Reason: legacy session cookie; tracked in JIRA-1234; expires 2026-09-15
# Re-review-date: 2026-09-15
10049	IGNORE	*

Cadence: every quarter, audit the config TSV - every IGNORE entry should have an Re-review-date. Past-due entries are removed + re-evaluated.

Step 7 - Output formats for cross-tool triage

docker run -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk/:rw -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable \
  zap-baseline.py -t https://app.example.com -J zap-report.json

The JSON report feeds cross-tool aggregation. For SARIF output (GitHub Code Scanning), use a converter (zap-sarif container action).

Step 8 - CI integration

GitHub Actions:

jobs:
  zap-baseline:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: zaproxy/action-baseline@v0.13.0
        with:
          target: 'https://staging.example.com'
          rules_file_name: '.zap/rules.tsv'
          cmd_options: '-J zap-report.json'
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        if: always()
        with: { name: zap-report, path: zap-report.json }

The official zaproxy/action-baseline action wraps the Docker invocation. Auto-creates a GitHub Issue on failure.

Designing the full team cadence around this job - PR-blocking passive baseline, nightly ZAP full + nuclei active layer, the baseline-finding ratchet for legacy apps, dedup, and coverage measurement - is in references/cadence.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Run zap-full-scan.py against productionActive payloads pollute / damage dataStaging-only (Step 5)
Skip -J JSON outputCan't feed finding triage; report is HTML-onlyAlways pass -J (Step 7)
Ignore Ajax spider for SPAsMissing routes; coverage gapAdd -j flag (Step 3)
Hardcode credentials in context fileSecrets leak in repoReference env vars (Step 4)
Suppress without # Re-review-datePermanent debtRequired template (Step 6)

Limitations

  • Baseline is passive only; full-scan needed for active probes but is not safe in production.
  • Spider duration default 1 min may miss deep-routes apps; increase via -m (Step 3).
  • ZAP scans single-target only; for multi-app fleet, run per-app
    • aggregate via cross-tool triage.
  • Authentication setup via context file is fragile - apps with complex login flows often need custom ZAP scripts (references/auth.md).

References

  • zap-base - official baseline scan documentation
  • zaproxy.org/docs/docker - full Docker docs
  • github.com/zaproxy/action-baseline - official GHA action
  • Authenticated-scan setup (context, auth methods, session management, verification): references/auth.md
  • Layered DAST cadence (PR baseline → nightly active, ratchet, dedup): references/cadence.md
  • nuclei-dast - sister DAST tool (template-driven scanning)
Workspace
testland
Visibility
Public
Created
Last updated
Publish Source
GitHub
Badge
testland/zap-baseline badge