Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear validated workflow, but it repeats its stop/dirty-mode rules and points to reference files that do not exist in the bundle. Tightening the repetition and shipping the referenced files would raise it to top marks.
Suggestions
Add the missing references/ files (scope.md, troubleshooting.md, engine-details.md, upstream.md) so the inline links resolve, or remove the dangling references.
Consolidate the repeated "exit 0 with no accepted/actionable findings → stop" rule and dirty-mode caveat into one authoritative section instead of restating them in Core Workflow, Context Efficiency, Helper, and Final Report.
Trim the engine Defaults prose (e.g., "usually delivers the best review results") that states preference Claude can infer from the contract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-dense and assumes competence, but the clean-exit/stop condition and dirty-mode caveats recur across Core Workflow, Context Efficiency, Helper, and Final Report, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready executable bash for every target mode, panels, and the harness, with real flags and model/thinking syntax rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 7-step Core Workflow sequences pick-target → verify → fix → rerun-tests-plus-autoreview → stop-on-clean with an explicit validation feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one level deep in the text, but the references/ directory and all four referenced .md files are absent on disk, so the navigation is broken rather than functional. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |