Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable with real verification commands, and follows a clear sequenced workflow with an explicit validation step. Its one weakness is progressive disclosure: three reference files are signaled but absent from the bundle, so the offloaded detail is not actually reachable.
Suggestions
Add the missing references/documentation.md, references/specifications.md, and references/structuring.md files to the bundle so the signaled deep content is actually reachable, or remove the inline references and inline the necessary guidance.
For the destructive 'delete or archive stale docs' step, add an explicit verify-before-delete checkpoint (e.g. confirm a doc is truly stale via rg before removing) to strengthen the validation feedback loop around that specific action.
Consider stating in the References section that those files are the canonical home for templates/tables, so it is unambiguous that detail lives there rather than inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instructional (terse principle bullets, bulleted workflow steps, a compact Output footer) and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than the padded level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable verification commands (e.g. `rg -n "old/path|stale-command" ...`, `test -e <path-from-docs>`, the symlink normalization test) plus a copy-paste diff example, matching the 'fully executable commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Audit -> Update routing -> Update deep docs -> Clean up drift -> Validate reality) with an explicit validation checkpoint and concrete checks; validation is present rather than missing, so the destructive-ops cap at 2 does not apply and it is above the implicit-checkpoint-only level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one level deep ([references/documentation.md], [references/specifications.md], [references/structuring.md]), but none of those files actually exist in the bundle, so the disclosed structure is not realized and navigation is broken — better organized than a monolithic level 1, but not the fully-realized level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |