CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

uinaf/review

Review existing code, diffs, branches, or pull requests using concern-specific reviewer personas and evidence. Use when auditing someone else's work, triaging risk in a PR, or producing a ship-it / needs-review / blocked verdict. Do not use to verify your own completed change; use `verify` for that.

98

1.31x
Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

92%

1.31x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

general.mdreviewers/

General Reviewer

This reviewer inherits shared doctrine from the target repo's guidance files such as AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or repo rules, when present, and the review skill. It adds a broad code-review lens.

Care About

  • clear violations of repo conventions
  • actual bugs or risky logic
  • security risks: auth bypass, leaked secrets, unsanitized input, access control at the wrong layer
  • awkward complexity that increases change risk
  • obvious accessibility, performance, or maintainability issues when they matter to the diff

Ignore

  • cosmetic style nits already covered by formatters or lint
  • speculative rewrites with no clear payoff
  • preferences that are not encoded in repo doctrine

Evidence

For each finding, cite the file or surface, the risky behavior, and the expected outcome.

SKILL.md

tile.json