CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

uinaf/verify

Run the builder-owned pre-review verification pass for a completed change using repo guardrails and real-surface evidence. Use a separate evaluator for complex, subjective, or high-risk work; when the repo is not verifiable, report blocked with the exact missing infrastructure and required setup.

94

1.04x
Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

1.04x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, concise, actionable verification skill with a clear gated workflow and concrete commands. Its one real weakness is progressive disclosure: the body links to three reference files that are not present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Ship the missing reference files (references/verification.md, references/evidence-rules.md, references/simplification.md) referenced in the body and References section, or remove the links and inline the essential content.

Verify each in-body reference path resolves to a real bundled file so the one-level-deep disclosure the skill advertises is actually navigable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body that assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what CI, guardrails, or smoke tests are, and every section earns its tokens with actionable guidance rather than filler.

3 / 3

Actionability

Gives concrete executable commands ("make verify", "just verify", "pnpm test", "cargo test", "curl http://127.0.0.1:3000/health", "node dist/cli.js --help") plus a concrete verdict taxonomy and a copy-ready output template.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly numbered 1–5 workflow with explicit checkpoints ("Run deterministic guardrails first", "before handoff, run the canonical local gate") and a feedback/synthesis step that enumerates verdict criteria and error-recovery guidance.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned and signals one-level-deep references (evidence-rules.md, simplification.md, verification.md) both inline and in a References list, but the references/ directory does not exist in the bundle, so the linked detail content is missing and navigation is broken.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, third-person description that states concrete actions, gives explicit use-when triggers, and carves out a distinct builder-owned pre-review niche with clear negative boundaries. It hits the top anchor on all four dimensions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "running repo guardrails", "exercising changed behavior end to end", "collecting evidence", "catching obvious self-correctable issues" — and concrete verdicts, matching the score-3 anchor for specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ("Self-check an agent's own completed change before independent review") and when ("Use when...") with an explicit trigger clause, satisfying the both-what-and-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when running repo guardrails, exercising changed behavior end to end, collecting evidence, or catching obvious self-correctable issues" clause gives good coverage of natural phrases a user would say when needing this pass.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear builder-owned pre-review niche with distinct triggers, and the negative boundary "Do not use to audit someone else's diff, branch, or PR" sharply separates it from independent-review skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 5 missing

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 10 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents