Content
15%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is an empty stub — a TODO placeholder with no instructions, no workflow, and no structure. Every dimension that measures delivered guidance (actionability, workflow clarity, progressive disclosure) is at the floor; only conciseness avoids a minimum score, and only because there is nothing verbose about a one-line placeholder. The skill is non-functional as written.
Suggestions
Replace the TODO placeholder with a concrete, executable workflow for systematic debugging, e.g. "1. Reproduce the failure with a minimal input; 2. Form one hypothesis about the cause; 3. Instrument or bisect to test the hypothesis; 4. Apply the smallest fix; 5. Verify by re-running the originally failing case."
Add explicit validation checkpoints (re-run the failing test, confirm the fix, check for regressions) so the workflow includes a feedback loop rather than a linear guess-and-patch sequence.
Organize the body with section headers (e.g. ## Process, ## Common pitfalls) so the content is navigable; if detail grows beyond the quick-start level, split advanced material into one-level-deep reference files under references/.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single placeholder line ("TODO: Add instructions for how the agent should execute this skill."), so there is no verbosity or padded explanation to penalize (ruling out anchors 1–2), but a TODO marker addressed to the skill author delivers no instructional value and no token earns its place, so it cannot score as lean, efficient content (anchors 4–5). It sits at the middle neutral point. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body contains zero concrete guidance — no code, commands, or steps — and is literally a placeholder acknowledging that instructions are absent, which is weaker than even anchor 1's example ("Use a PDF library to extract the text content...") that at least describes a task. Anchor 2 requires high-level hints, of which there are none. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No steps exist in any form, matching anchor 1 ("Steps missing or incoherent; no sequence; no validation for risky operations"). Anchor 2 requires at least a rough sequence ("1. Open the document..."), which is absent — the body provides nothing to sequence. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has no sections, no structure, and no navigation, matching anchor 1's "no structure; impossible to navigate" clause; anchor 2 requires inlined content that belongs in separate files or buried references, and there is no content or references at all. No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), and the simple-skill exception does not apply because a single TODO line is not "well-organized sections". | 1 / 5 |
Total | 6 / 20 Passed |