CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 39 AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Includes 5 callable workflow skills (rails-tdd-loop, rails-review-flow, rails-setup-flow, rails-quality-flow, rails-engines-flow) for complete development cycles. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

95

1.20x
Quality

98%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

1.20x

Average score across 35 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

response_templates.mdskills/code-quality/rails-review-response/assets/

Review response templates

Templates to respond to common reviewer comments with clarity and code references.

  1. Agree & implement

Thanks — good catch. I will:

  • Add a unit spec covering this case (spec/path)
  • Move logic into Service::Name and update controller to call it
  • Update README with usage
  1. Clarify & propose minimal change

Thanks for the note. I think the current behavior was intentional because X. Proposal:

  • Apply a small guard in controller
  • Add request spec verifying behavior
  • Keep current API for backwards compatibility
  1. Disagree respectfully

Thanks for the review. I believe changing this would break existing integrations because Y. Proposed alternative:

  • Keep current behavior but add a deprecation note and feature flag
  • Follow up in a separate PR to avoid expanding scope of this change

Helpful tips:

  • Always reference the failing test line or example
  • Provide a short code diff snippet when possible
  • Offer to follow up in a new PR if the change is large

skills

code-quality

rails-review-response

README.md

tile.json