CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 39 AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Includes 5 callable workflow skills (rails-tdd-loop, rails-review-flow, rails-setup-flow, rails-quality-flow, rails-engines-flow) for complete development cycles. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.

95

1.20x
Quality

98%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

1.20x

Average score across 35 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.mdskills/ddd/ddd-boundaries-review/

name:
ddd-boundaries-review
license:
MIT
description:
Use when reviewing a Ruby on Rails app for Domain-Driven Design boundaries, bounded contexts, language leakage, cross-context orchestration, or unclear ownership. Identifies misplaced domain models, detects cross-context coupling, names ownership conflicts, and recommends the smallest credible boundary improvement. Covers context mapping and leakage detection.

DDD Boundaries Review

Use this skill when the main problem is not syntax or style, but unclear domain boundaries.

Core principle: Fix context leakage before adding more patterns.

Quick Reference

AreaWhat to check
Bounded contextsDistinct language, rules, and ownership
Context leakageOne area reaching across another's concepts casually
Shared modelsSame object name used with conflicting meanings
OrchestrationUse cases coordinating multiple contexts without a clear owner
OwnershipWho owns invariants, transitions, and side effects

HARD-GATE

DO NOT recommend splitting code into new contexts unless the business boundary is explicit enough to name.
DO NOT treat every large module as a bounded context automatically.
ALWAYS identify the leaked language or ownership conflict before proposing structural changes.

When to Use

  • The repo appears to mix multiple business concepts under one model or service namespace.
  • Teams are debating ownership, boundaries, or where a rule belongs.
  • A Rails architecture review reveals cross-domain coupling.
  • Next step: Chain to ddd-rails-modeling when a context is clear enough to model tactically, or to refactor-safely when boundaries need incremental extraction.

Review Order

  1. Map entry points: Start from controllers, jobs, services, APIs, and UI flows that expose business behavior.
  2. Name the contexts: Group flows and rules by business capability, not by current folder names alone.
  3. Find leakage: Look for terms, validations, workflows, or side effects crossing context boundaries.
  4. Check ownership: Decide which context should own invariants, transitions, and external side effects.
  5. Propose the smallest credible improvement: Rename, extract, isolate, or wrap before attempting large reorganizations.

Output Style

Write findings first.

For each finding include:

  • Severity
  • Contexts involved
  • Leaked term / ownership conflict
  • Why the current boundary is risky
  • Smallest credible improvement

Then list open questions and recommended next skills.

Detecting Leakage

Use ripgrep to find cross-context references before reading code manually:

# Find references from one context into another
rg 'Billing.*Fleet|Fleet.*Billing' app/

# Find cross-namespace constant usage
rg 'Billing::[A-Z]' app/services/fleet/
rg 'Fleet::[A-Z]' app/services/billing/

# Find callbacks that touch foreign concepts
rg 'after_(create|update|save).*Job|after_(create|update|save).*Mailer' app/models/

See EXAMPLES.md for a worked leakage example, a sample finding block, and pitfalls.

Integration

SkillWhen to chain
ddd-ubiquitous-languageWhen the review is blocked by fuzzy or overloaded terminology
ddd-rails-modelingWhen a context is clear and needs entities/value objects/services modeled cleanly
rails-architecture-reviewWhen the same problem also needs a broader Rails structure review
refactor-safelyWhen the recommended improvement needs incremental extraction instead of a rewrite

skills

README.md

tile.json