Curated library of 39 AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Includes 5 callable workflow skills (rails-tdd-loop, rails-review-flow, rails-setup-flow, rails-quality-flow, rails-engines-flow) for complete development cycles. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.
95
98%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
1.20xAverage score across 35 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
When writing or generating code for this project, follow these conventions. Stack: Ruby on Rails, PostgreSQL, Hotwire (Turbo + Stimulus), Tailwind CSS.
Style: If the project uses a linter, treat it as the source of truth for formatting. For cross-cutting design principles (DRY, YAGNI, structured logging, rules by directory), use rails-code-conventions.
ALL new code MUST have its test written and validated BEFORE implementation.
1. Write the spec: bundle exec rspec spec/[path]_spec.rb
2. Verify it FAILS — output must show the feature does not exist yet
3. Write the implementation code
4. Verify it PASSES — run the same spec and confirm green
5. Refactor if needed, keeping tests green
See rspec-best-practices for the full gate cycle.For a typical feature, compose stack patterns in this order:
includes for any association used in loopsturbo_stream and html formats<turbo-frame> tags; broadcast turbo_stream responses from the controllerEach step should remain testable in isolation before wiring to the next layer.
<%# Wrap a section to be replaced without a full page reload %>
<turbo-frame id="order-<%= @order.id %>">
<%= render "orders/details", order: @order %>
</turbo-frame>
<%# Link that targets only this frame %>
<%= link_to "Edit", edit_order_path(@order), data: { turbo_frame: "order-#{@order.id}" } %>respond_to do |format|
format.turbo_stream do
render turbo_stream: turbo_stream.replace(
"order_#{@order.id}",
partial: "orders/order",
locals: { order: @order }
)
end
format.html { redirect_to @order }
end# BAD — triggers one query per order
@orders = Order.where(user: current_user)
@orders.each { |o| o.line_items.count }
# GOOD — single JOIN via includes
@orders = Order.includes(:line_items).where(user: current_user)# Controller stays thin — delegate to service
result = Orders::CreateOrder.call(user: current_user, params: order_params)
if result[:success]
redirect_to result[:order], notice: "Order created"
else
@order = Order.new(order_params)
render :new, status: :unprocessable_entity
endSee ruby-service-objects for the full .call pattern and response format.
This project uses Devise for authentication and Pundit for authorization. Apply these on every feature that introduces access-controlled resources.
| Issue | Correct approach |
|---|---|
| Business logic in views | Use helpers, presenters, or Stimulus controllers |
| N+1 queries in loops | Eager load with includes before the loop |
| Skipping FactoryBot for "quick" tests | Fixtures are brittle — always use factories |
| Controller action with 15+ lines of business logic | Extract to a service object |
| Model with no validations on required fields | Add presence/format validations |
| View with 10+ lines of embedded Ruby conditionals | Move logic to a presenter or partial |
| Hardcoded strings that belong in I18n | Use t() helpers |
| Skill | When to chain |
|---|---|
| rails-code-conventions | For design principles, structured logging, and path-specific rules |
| rails-code-review | When reviewing existing code against these conventions |
| ruby-service-objects | When extracting business logic into service objects |
| rspec-best-practices | For testing conventions and full red/green/refactor TDD cycle |
| rails-architecture-review | For structural review beyond conventions |
docs
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
mcp_server
skills
api
api-rest-collection
rails-graphql-best-practices
code-quality
rails-architecture-review
rails-code-conventions
rails-code-review
rails-review-response
rails-security-review
rails-stack-conventions
assets
snippets
refactor-safely
context
rails-context-engineering
rails-project-onboarding
ddd
ddd-boundaries-review
ddd-rails-modeling
ddd-ubiquitous-language
engines
rails-engine-compatibility
rails-engine-docs
rails-engine-extraction
rails-engine-installers
rails-engine-release
rails-engine-reviewer
rails-engine-testing
infrastructure
rails-api-versioning
rails-background-jobs
rails-database-seeding
rails-frontend-hotwire
rails-migration-safety
rails-performance-optimization
orchestration
rails-skills-orchestrator
patterns
ruby-service-objects
strategy-factory-null-calculator
yard-documentation
planning
create-prd
generate-tasks
ticket-planning
testing
rails-bug-triage
rails-tdd-slices
rspec-best-practices
rspec-service-testing