CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of 28 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: testing, code-quality, engines, infrastructure, api, and context. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, Hotwire, and TDD automation. Shared Ruby skills (YARD docs, DDD, service objects) have moved to ruby-core-skills. Repository agents remain documented in GitHub but are intentionally excluded from the Tessl tile.

93

1.78x
Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

93%

1.78x

Average score across 28 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.mdskills/code-quality/apply-code-conventions/

name:
apply-code-conventions
license:
MIT
description:
A daily checklist for writing clean Rails code, covering design principles (DRY, YAGNI, PORO, CoC, KISS), per-path rules (models, services, workers, controllers), structured logging, and comment discipline. Defers style and formatting to the project's configured linter(s). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Ruby on Rails code, or when asked about Rails best practices, clean code, or code quality. Trigger words: code review, refactor, RoR, clean code, best practices, Ruby on Rails conventions.
metadata:
{"version":"1.0.0","user-invocable":"true"}

Apply Code Conventions

Style source of truth: Style and formatting defer to the project's configured linter(s). This skill adds non-style behavior and architecture guidance only. For Hotwire + Tailwind specifics, see apply-stack-conventions.

Quick Reference

TopicRule
PrinciplesDRY, YAGNI, PORO where it helps, CoC, KISS
Comments / tagsExplain why; tagged notes need actionable context
LoggingFirst arg: static string; second arg: hash with event: key; no interpolation; backtrace on errors
Deep stacksChain apply-stack-conventions → domain skills (services, jobs, RSpec)

HARD-GATE

TESTS GATE IMPLEMENTATION:
When this skill guides new behavior, the tests gate still applies:
PRD → TASKS → TEST (write, run, fail) → IMPLEMENTATION → …
No implementation code before a failing test. See write-tests.

Core Process

When reviewing or refactoring Rails code, follow this sequence. Each step maps to a required checkpoint in your output.

  1. Run linter — Detect config (for example .rubocop.yml or .standard.yml), run the appropriate tool, note absence if none found. Do not invent style rules; all style/formatting defers to the detected config. Output: state which linter was detected (or absent) and that style defers to it.
  2. Apply area-specific rules — Check path patterns (e.g., models, background jobs, controllers) and apply targeted guidance from the Apply by area table below. Output: concrete per-path recommendations for every relevant changed file.
  3. Verify tests gate — Confirm failing tests exist before any new behavior; run specs and checkpoints. Output: state the failing spec, run command, expected failure, minimal implementation step, and passing rerun.
  4. Enforce structured logging — Ensure all Rails.logger calls use static strings + structured hashes with an event: key, plus backtrace for errors. Output: apply structured logging rules from Sub-Rules below.
  5. Enforce comment discipline — Ensure all tags (TODO:, FIXME:) have actionable context (owner, ticket). Output: apply comment discipline rules from Sub-Rules below.
  6. Chain to specialised skills — Use the Integration table to pull in deeper guidance (security, jobs, specs) as needed.

Language: English unless explicitly requested otherwise.

Sub-Rules

Comments and tagged notes

Comment why, not what. Tagged notes — TODO: / FIXME: / HACK: / NOTE: / OPTIMIZE: — are MANDATORY in these triggers; every tag carries actionable context. Naked tags (# TODO: fix this) fail review.

# BAD — naked tag, no context
# TODO: fix this

# GOOD — TODO with next step + dependency
# TODO(jsmith, JIRA-1234): replace TIER_RATES with DB-backed lookup once billing API v2 is stable.

Structured Logging

MANDATORY SHAPE — every Rails.logger.* call uses exactly two positional arguments.

Rails.logger.<level>(static_string_message, { event: "dot.namespaced", ...domain_fields })

# GOOD — error path with backtrace
rescue StandardError => e
  Rails.logger.error("order.processing_failed", {
    event: "order.processing_failed",
    error: e.message,
    backtrace: e.backtrace.first(5).join("\n")
  })
  raise
end
  • 1st arg (string): static string literal.
  • 2nd arg (hash): first key is always event:.

Apply by area (path patterns)

AreaPath patternGuidance
ActiveRecord performanceapp/models/**/*.rbEager load in loops; prefer pluck / exists? / find_each.
Controllersapp/controllers/**/*_controller.rbStrong params; thin actions → services; IDOR / PII → security-check.
RSpecspec/**/*_spec.rbFactoryBot; let > let! unless eager setup required.
Service objectsapp/services/**/*.rbSingle responsibility; .call / injected deps.
Background jobsapp/jobs/**/*.rb / app/workers/**/*.rbIdempotency, retries, queue choice, and side-effect boundaries → implement-background-job.

RSpec and let_it_be (test-prof)

Only recommend let_it_be if test-prof is already in Gemfile.lock. Otherwise default to let; reach for let! only when lazy evaluation would break the example. Don't introduce test-prof unless asked.

Extended Resources (Progressive Disclosure)

Load these files only when their specific content is needed:

  • assets/checklist.md — Use for detailed code review checklists.
  • assets/snippets.md — Use for quick code snippets of common patterns.

Integration

SkillWhen to chain
apply-stack-conventionsStack-specific: PostgreSQL, Hotwire, Tailwind
model-domainWhen domain concepts and invariants need clearer Rails-first modeling choices
create-service-objectImplementing or refining service objects
implement-background-jobWorkers, queues, retries, idempotency
write-testsSpec style, tests gate (red/green/refactor), request vs controller specs
security-checkControllers, params, IDOR, PII
code-reviewFull PR pass before merge

skills

README.md

tile.json