Curated library of 28 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: testing, code-quality, engines, infrastructure, api, and context. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, Hotwire, and TDD automation. Shared Ruby skills (YARD docs, DDD, service objects) have moved to ruby-core-skills. Repository agents remain documented in GitHub but are intentionally excluded from the Tessl tile.
93
95%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.78xAverage score across 28 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Use this skill when the task is to write, review, or clean up RSpec tests.
Core principle: Prefer behavioral confidence over implementation coupling. Good specs are readable, deterministic, and cheap to maintain.
| Aspect | Rule |
|---|---|
| Spec types | Model: domain logic; Request: HTTP endpoints (prefer over controller); Job: background processing; Service/PORO: no Rails helpers; System: critical E2E only (slow) |
| Assertions | Test behavior, not implementation |
| Factories | Minimal — only attributes needed; use traits for optional states; prefer build/build_stubbed over create |
| Mocking | Stub external boundaries, not internal code |
| Isolation | Each example independent; no shared mutable state |
| Naming | describe for class/method, context for scenario |
| Service specs | Required: describe '.call' and subject(:result) for the primary invocation |
let vs let! | Default to let; let! ONLY when object must exist before example runs |
| External service mocking | allow(ServiceClass).to receive(:method) — not instance_double; instance_double only for injected collaborators |
| Example names | Present tense: it 'returns the user'; NEVER it 'should ...'; NEVER contains and — see One Behavior Per Example |
aggregate_failures | Use when asserting multiple related items in one example |
TESTS GATE IMPLEMENTATION:
DO NOT write implementation code before a failing test exists.
When writing tests for new behavior, follow the TDD workflow exactly:
1. Write spec
2. Run spec and verify it fails
3. Implement minimal code
4. Run spec and verify it passes
ONE BEHAVIOR PER EXAMPLE:
The word "and" in an `it` / `specify` description signals two behaviors in one example. Split it every time — no exceptions.When driving new behaviour with RSpec, follow this sequence:
e.g. failure examples in the final artifact.| Change type | Start with |
|---|---|
| Pure domain logic | Model or PORO service spec |
| HTTP endpoint behaviour | Request spec |
| Background processing | Job spec |
| Cross-layer user journey | System spec (sparingly) |
RSpec.describe Invoices::MarkOverdue do
describe '.call' do
subject(:result) { described_class.call(invoice: invoice) }
context 'when the invoice is overdue and unpaid' do
let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: nil) }
it 'marks the invoice overdue' do
expect { result }.to change { invoice.reload.overdue? }.from(false).to(true)
end
end
end
end# BAD — two assertions; if the first fails, the second never runs
it 'returns 201 and creates the record' do; end
# GOOD — one observable outcome per example
it 'returns 201' do; end
it 'creates the record' do; end| Cause | Fix |
|---|---|
| Time-dependent logic | freeze_time / travel_to; never set past dates as shortcut |
| State leakage | Each example sets up own state; avoid before(:all) |
| Async jobs | queue_adapter = :test + have_enqueued_job; never assert side-effects imperatively |
| External HTTP | WebMock / VCR; never allow real network in CI |
| DB state bleed | Transactional fixtures or DatabaseCleaner; never share let! across contexts |
| Race conditions | Explicit Capybara waits; avoid sleep |
| Imprecise assertions | change.from().to() over final state; exact values over be_truthy/be_falsey; see rule 16 for updated_at |
Load these files only when their specific content is needed:
When asked to write or review RSpec specs, your output MUST satisfy each rule below. Each is graded independently — one violation drops the whole check.
app/foo/bar.rb → spec/foo/bar_spec.rb.# frozen_string_literal: true as the first line of every spec file.RSpec.describe uses the full constant path (RSpec.describe Module::Class do), not a string.describe '#method' / describe '.class_method' for each method under test.context 'when ...' / context 'with ...' for scenario variations — never use context to group methods.let for test data, let! ONLY when the object must exist before the action under test.let_it_be unless the project already depends on test-prof (check Gemfile.lock first).subject(:result) { ... } for service / PORO specs invoking .call.travel_to / freeze_time for any time-dependent assertion — never set past Time.now or stub Time.current directly.allow(SomeClient).to receive(:method)); ActiveRecord finders are NEVER mocked.e.g. before the failure message.build / build_stubbed unless persistence is required. Do not hide business-meaningful defaults in the factory.aggregate_failures when one behavior needs several related expectations, and show it in the produced spec when relevant.updated_at unless time is frozen and the timestamp change is the behavior under test.it/specify descriptions contain "and".let! is justified by a must-exist-before-action constraint.travel_to when the original timestamp matters.| Skill | When to chain |
|---|---|
| plan-tests | Choosing the best first failing spec for a Rails change |
| create-service-object | Providing test structure for the .call pattern |
| refactor-code | Adding characterization tests before refactoring |
| implement-graphql | Writing specs for GraphQL resolvers and mutations |
| tdd-process (from ruby-core-skills) | Process discipline: Red-Green-Refactor gates, checkpoint pattern |
agents
docs
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
skills
api
generate-api-collection
implement-graphql
code-quality
apply-code-conventions
apply-stack-conventions
assets
snippets
code-review
refactor-code
review-architecture
security-check
context
load-context
setup-environment
engines
create-engine
create-engine-installer
document-engine
extract-engine
release-engine
review-engine
test-engine
upgrade-engine
infrastructure
implement-background-job
implement-hotwire
optimize-performance
review-migration
seed-database
version-api
testing
plan-tests
test-service
write-tests