Audit and improve skill collections with an 8-dimension scoring framework, duplication detection, remediation planning, and CI quality gates; use when evaluating skill quality, generating remediation plans, validating report format, or enforcing repository-wide skill artifact conventions.
Does it follow best practices?
Evaluation — 93%
↑ 1.33xAgent success when using this tile
Validation for skill structure
Complete scoring framework and threshold interpretation for skill quality assessment.
| Score Range | Grade | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 108+ | A | Production Ready | Tessl registry eligible |
| 96-107 | B+ | Good Quality | Minor improvements |
| 84-95 | B/C+ | Passing | Remediation recommended |
| 70-83 | C | Below Standard | Major improvements required |
| <70 | F | Failing | Complete rework needed |
| Dimension | Max Points | Priority | Focus Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Delta | 20 | HIGHEST | Expert-only content |
| Mindset + Procedures | 15 | HIGH | Philosophy + workflows |
| Anti-Pattern Quality | 15 | HIGH | NEVER + WHY + consequences |
| Practical Usability | 15 | HIGH | Concrete examples |
| Specification Compliance | 15 | MEDIUM | Description field critical |
| Progressive Disclosure | 15 | MEDIUM | Hub + references |
| Freedom Calibration | 15 | MEDIUM | Appropriate rigidity |
| Pattern Recognition | 10 | LOW | Activation keywords |
Focus on the "Big 3": Knowledge Delta, Anti-Patterns, Progressive Disclosure
Address specification compliance and practical usability first
Complete restructure required - start with navigation hub and expert content
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i pantheon-ai/skill-quality-auditor@0.1.4evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
references
scripts