Audit and improve skill collections with an 8-dimension scoring framework, duplication detection, remediation planning, and CI quality gates; use when evaluating skill quality, generating remediation plans, validating report format, or enforcing repository-wide skill artifact conventions.
Does it follow best practices?
Evaluation — 93%
↑ 1.33xAgent success when using this tile
Validation for skill structure
Guide to interpreting skill quality audit reports and taking action based on findings.
Contains:
Contains:
Contains:
| Grade | Count | Percentage |
|-------|-------|------------|
| A | 35 | 70% |
| B | 12 | 24% |
| C | 3 | 6% |Interpretation:
| Skill | Score | Grade | Lines |
|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| bdd-testing | 98/120 | A | 64 |
| typescript-advanced | 85/120 | B | 450 |
| old-patterns | 72/120 | C | 800 |Actions by Score:
| Score | Priority | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 108+ | Maintain | Keep current, monitor |
| 96-107 | Low | Minor improvements optional |
| 90-95 | Medium | Review for improvements |
| 78-89 | High | Requires attention |
| <78 | Critical | Immediate action needed |
High Lines, Low Score (450, 72):
Low Lines, Low Score (80, 75):
High Lines, High Score (450, 105):
| Skill Pair | Similarity | Common Lines | Action |
|------------|------------|--------------|--------|
| bdd-gherkin ↔ cucumber | 42% | 287 | Aggregate |
| typescript-* family | 28% avg | 156 | Consider |Action by Similarity:
| Similarity | Priority | Action |
|---|---|---|
| >50% | Critical | Immediate consolidation |
| 35-50% | High | Plan aggregation |
| 20-35% | Medium | Review for opportunity |
| <20% | Low | Monitor |
## BDD Family (6 skills, 2,032 lines, 35% avg duplication)
- bdd-collaboration
- bdd-gherkin
- bdd-patterns
- bdd-principles
- bdd-scenarios
- cucumber-best-practicesActions:
| Metric | Target | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| A-grade rate | >90% | A-count / total |
| Average score | >100 | Total score / count |
| Max file size | <500 lines | wc -l SKILL.md |
| Description quality | 100% | With keywords / total |
| Metric | Target | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Average duplication | <5% | Sum similarity / pairs |
| Critical pairs (>35%) | 0 | Count where >35% |
| Aggregation candidates | <5 | Count where >20% |
| Metric | Target | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Deprecated skills | Minimize | Count in .deprecated/ |
| Orphan references | 0 | Broken @see links |
| Outdated reports | <7 days | Age of latest audit |
Address C-grade skills
Fix critical duplication
Fix broken references
Improve B-grade skills
Plan aggregations
Update documentation
Review skill collection
Update baselines
Team review
# Compare with previous audit
diff .context/analysis/skill-audit-2026-01-15.md \
.context/analysis/skill-audit-2026-02-20.mdLook for:
| Trend | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A-grade increasing | Quality improving |
| Average score rising | Skills getting better |
| Duplication decreasing | Consolidation working |
| File sizes shrinking | Progressive disclosure applied |
# Skill Quality Summary
## Overall Health: Good (87/100)
- **Skills**: 50 active, 10 deprecated
- **Quality**: 72% A-grade (target: 90%)
- **Duplication**: 12% (target: <5%)
- **Trend**: Improving (+5% from last quarter)
## Key Actions
1. Consolidate BDD family (6 → 1 skill)
2. Improve 8 B-grade skills to A
3. Reduce duplication from 12% to <5%Provide full reports for technical teams with:
reporting-dashboards.md - Visualizationadvanced-trends-analysis.md - Historical trackingscripts-audit-workflow.md - Running auditsInstall with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i pantheon-ai/skill-quality-auditor@0.1.4evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
references
scripts