Audit and improve skill collections with a 9-dimension scoring framework (Knowledge Delta, Mindset, Anti-Patterns, Specification Compliance, Progressive Disclosure, Freedom Calibration, Pattern Recognition, Practical Usability, Eval Validation), duplication detection, remediation planning, baseline comparison, and CI quality gates; use when evaluating skill quality, generating remediation plans, detecting duplicates, validating artifact conventions, or enforcing publication thresholds.
93
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.26xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
An audit of three skills produced the following scores:
ci-cd/github-actions-generator: 94/140 (C+) — D3: 6/15, D5: 7/15, D9: 4/20documentation/markdown-authoring: 101/140 (C) — D1: 12/20, D3: 5/15, D7: 6/10testing/bdd-testing: 88/140 (C) — D2: 8/15, D3: 4/15, D5: 6/15All three are blocked from publishing (threshold: >=126/140 for A-grade).
Create a prioritised remediation plan for ci-cd/github-actions-generator that will raise its score to A-grade. The plan must be concrete enough for a developer to execute without further clarification.
Produce:
assets
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
references
scripts