CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pantheon-ai/skill-quality-auditor

Audit and improve skill collections with a 9-dimension scoring framework (Knowledge Delta, Mindset, Anti-Patterns, Specification Compliance, Progressive Disclosure, Freedom Calibration, Pattern Recognition, Practical Usability, Eval Validation), duplication detection, remediation planning, baseline comparison, and CI quality gates; use when evaluating skill quality, generating remediation plans, detecting duplicates, validating artifact conventions, or enforcing publication thresholds.

93

1.26x
Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.26x

Average score across 5 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

scoring-rubric.mdreferences/

Scoring Rubric

Dimension Weights

DimensionWeightDescription
D1 Knowledge Delta20Non-obvious guidance depth
D2 Mindset + Procedures15Procedural clarity
D3 Anti-Pattern Quality15Specificity and enforceability
D4 Specification Compliance15Metadata/spec alignment
D5 Progressive Disclosure15Hub-to-reference balance
D6 Freedom Calibration15Constraint/flexibility balance
D7 Pattern Recognition10Trigger/intent discoverability
D8 Practical Usability15Actionable examples/commands
D9 Eval Validation20Runtime validation via tessl evals
Total140Overall score

Grade Scale

GradeScore RangeAssessment
A+133-140Exceptional
A126-132Strong
B+119-125Solid baseline
B112-118Good with gaps
C+105-111Moderate
C98-104Mixed quality
D91-97Low quality
F0-90Unacceptable

Signal Levels

  • Strong: score >= 80% of max
  • Moderate: score 50-79% of max
  • Weak: score < 50% of max

Priority Guidance

  • High: weak signal, immediate remediation
  • Medium: moderate signal, targeted improvements
  • Low: strong signal, maintain and refine

SKILL.md

tile.json