Granular 4-phase, 4-role GDS Service Standard assurance skills and synthesis engine.
87%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Ask:
Evidence to request: spike notes marked disposable, a list of what was thrown away.
Answers that indicate Met: the team describes the work as throwaway spikes and can show a negative result.
Answers that indicate Not Met: the Alpha repository is the Beta codebase, or a production account already exists. Red line A1.
Ask:
Evidence to request: a statement on synthetic data, privacy items on the architectural risk register.
Answers that indicate Met: spikes were synthetic, and the register names a data risk the team has not closed.
Answers that indicate Not Met: a production database of real users, or a schema already treated as the processing purpose.
Ask:
Evidence to request: spike comparison, buy-versus-build decision log, architectural risk register with residual risks.
Answers that indicate Met: rejected options are specific, the risk register has owners for Beta, and nothing is deployed as the production platform.
Answers that indicate Not Met: a single option was spiked because it had already been procured. Or Terraform for the production account is in the pack. Red line A1.
When the evidence supports the points, write the findings so a reader sees all four of these ideas: throwaway, spike, buy-versus-build, and risk register. The Alpha technical eval looks for that vocabulary on a pass.
.tessl-plugin
skills
alpha-assessor-design
alpha-assessor-lead
alpha-assessor-technical
alpha-assessor-user-research
assessment-report-synthesis
beta-assessor-design
beta-assessor-lead
beta-assessor-technical
beta-assessor-user-research
discovery-assessor-design
discovery-assessor-lead
discovery-assessor-technical
discovery-assessor-user-research
live-assessor-design
live-assessor-lead
live-assessor-technical
live-assessor-user-research