Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill for counterexample-guided proof debugging with strong actionability and workflow clarity. The code examples are concrete and executable, and the progressive disclosure to reference files is well-organized. Minor improvements could be made by reducing redundancy between the patterns and root causes sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate 'Counterexample Analysis Patterns' and 'Common Root Causes' sections to eliminate redundancy - they cover overlapping content (e.g., missing preconditions appears in both)
Remove or condense the 'Debugging Checklist' section as it largely repeats the workflow steps already defined in section 6
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy, particularly in the 'Common Root Causes' section which overlaps with 'Counterexample Analysis Patterns'. The checklist at the end repeats workflow steps, and some explanatory text could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable code examples in both Isabelle and Coq syntax showing before/after fixes. The patterns section gives specific symptoms and fixes, and the workflow steps are clear and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints ('Retest with fix', 'Verify manually'). The debugging checklist provides a clear sequence with feedback loops for iterative debugging. Steps are well-sequenced for the multi-step debugging process. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with clear overview sections and well-signaled one-level-deep references to detailed guides (nitpick_guide.md, quickchick_guide.md, examples.md). Content is appropriately split between the main skill and reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |