Debug proof failures using counterexamples from Nitpick (Isabelle) or QuickChick (Coq) to identify specification errors, missing preconditions, and proof strategy issues. Use when: (1) A proof attempt fails and you need to understand why, (2) Counterexamples are generated by Nitpick or QuickChick, (3) Specifications may be incorrect or incomplete, (4) Theorems need validation before proving, (5) Missing preconditions or lemmas need identification, or (6) Proof failures need explanation and correction suggestions. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.
93
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.10xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Scanned
0f00a4f
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.