analyze-ci-failures

Analyze CI failures on Azure SDK for .NET pull requests and post a comment with how-to-fix instructions. Use when a PR has failing checks, CI is red, or someone asks for help fixing CI.

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Skill: analyze-ci-failures

Name: analyze-ci-failures
Rating: 77.60000000000001 (1 reviews)
Author: Azure

Analyze CI failures on an Azure SDK for .NET pull request and post a GitHub comment with actionable fix instructions.

When Invoked

Trigger phrases: "analyze CI failures", "fix CI", "why is CI failing", "help with CI", "analyze PR checks", "CI is red", "failing checks".

Inputs

The user must provide a PR number, PR URL, or pipeline build ID. If not provided, ask the user.

Workflow

1. Gather information

Fetch PR details, check statuses, changed files, and workflow runs using GitHub MCP tools.
Extract service directory and package name from changed file paths (sdk/<service>/<package>/).
If a pipeline build ID is available (often in auto-generated PR descriptions), use azure-sdk-mcp-azsdk_analyze_pipeline for deeper log analysis.
For failed GitHub Actions jobs, use github-mcp-server-get_job_logs with return_content: true to get logs.

2. Identify failures

Classify each failure using the CI check mapping and log symptom patterns below. Also inspect the PR's code directly (e.g., read generated files for compile errors, check for missing scaffolding files).

3. Post a comment

Compose a GitHub comment with:

Header: ## 🔍 CI Failure Analysis for PR #<number>
Summary table: All checks with ✅ ❌ ⏳ status
Per-failure sections: Specific to THIS PR — include actual error messages, affected files, and concrete fix commands with <service>/<package> filled in
Quick fix command at the end if applicable

Before posting, check existing comments for ## 🔍 CI Failure Analysis to avoid duplicates.

CI Check Name → Failure Mapping

These are the Azure DevOps and GitHub checks that run on SDK PRs. The check names are repo-specific and not discoverable from general knowledge.

Check Name Pattern	What It Validates	Key Script
`Build Analyze PRBatch`	Umbrella: code generation, API export, snippets, spelling, CPM, build + pack	`eng/scripts/CodeChecks.ps1`
`Verify Generated Code`	Generated code matches what the generator produces	`eng/scripts/CodeChecks.ps1`
`Validate CPM Compliance`	Central Package Management policy	`eng/scripts/Validate-CpmCompliance.ps1`
`Build` / `Pack`	Compilation + NuGet packaging (ApiCompat runs during pack only)	`dotnet pack`
`Analyze`	Samples, READMEs, snippets compile	`eng/scripts/Build-Snippets.ps1`
`check-spelling`	Spell-checking changed files	`cspell` via `eng/common/scripts/check-spelling-in-changed-files.ps1`
`verify-links`	Markdown link validation	`eng/common/scripts/Verify-Links.ps1`
`checkenforcer`	Meta-check: waits for all other checks to pass	`.github/workflows/event-processor.yml`

Log Symptom → Root Cause Mapping

These are exact strings/patterns to search for in CI logs. They are specific to this repo's scripts and not inferrable from general knowledge.

Log symptom	Root cause	Category
`Generated code is not up to date`	Generated code out of sync	Regenerate code
`git diff --exit-code` failure in CodeChecks	Generated or API files changed after re-running scripts	Regenerate + export API
`error CS####:`	C# compilation error	Build failure — inspect the specific error code
`Build FAILED`	Compilation failure	Build failure
`MembersMustExist` / `TypesMustExist`	ApiCompat breaking change (only surfaces in `dotnet pack`)	API compatibility
`ManagePackageVersionsCentrally` / `VersionOverride`	CPM policy violation	CPM compliance
`cspell` unknown words	Spelling error in code or API surface	Spelling
`Spell check failed`	Spelling error in API surface files	Spelling
README instruction format / `NuGet\\Install-Package`	README uses wrong install format (must use `dotnet add package`)	README validation
`verify-links` broken URL	Broken markdown links	Link verification
Path length exceeded	File path > 210 chars	File path issue

New Package Checklist

For PRs that introduce a new SDK package (all files are added, no prior version exists), also check for these commonly missing scaffolding files:

CHANGELOG.md
README.md
Directory.Build.props (must import parent props)
ci.mgmt.yml (for management-plane) or CI pipeline config
api/*.cs (public API surface listings — generated via Export-API.ps1)
assets.json (test recording assets)

Without ci.mgmt.yml, the Azure DevOps CI pipeline won't trigger — this is a common reason for checkenforcer staying permanently pending.

Repository: Azure/azure-sdk-for-net
Path: .github/skills/analyze-ci-failures/SKILL.md
Commit: 2f47f87

Last updated: 2 days ago
First committed: 5 months ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.