CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

analyze-ci-failures

Analyze CI failures on Azure SDK for .NET pull requests and post a comment with how-to-fix instructions. Use when a PR has failing checks, CI is red, or someone asks for help fixing CI.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

—

The risk profile of this skill

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

High-quality content: dense, non-inferable domain knowledge delivered as exact tool calls, API URLs, and log-pattern mappings, with a well-sequenced workflow and explicit error handling. Minor improvements possible by trimming the duplicated trigger-phrase section and moving the lookup tables into reference files.

Suggestions

Drop the 'When Invoked' trigger-phrase section — triggering is already handled by the frontmatter description.

Move the CI check-name and log-symptom mapping tables into a references/ file (e.g., references/failure-mappings.md), keeping only a pointer and the most common patterns in SKILL.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and every table carries non-inferable, repo-specific knowledge with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. One minor trimmable item: the 'When Invoked' trigger-phrase list duplicates the frontmatter description.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: exact timeline API URL with api-version, exact MCP tool names and parameters, exact log symptom strings, file paths, and the comment header format to emit.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 3-step sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery paths: tool-unavailable fallback to curl, escalation when issues are insufficient, unconfirmed-root-cause handling, and a duplicate-comment check before posting.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-file skill with no bundle, organized into clear sections that are easy to navigate. The two lookup tables (~40 lines of check-name and log-symptom mappings) are reference-file material that sits inline, keeping it just short of ideal content splitting.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states concrete capabilities, an explicit 'Use when' clause with natural trigger phrases, and a well-defined niche. The only weaknesses are a slightly generic 'analyze' verb and a few missing trigger synonyms.

Suggestions

Enumerate a few more diagnostic actions (e.g., fetch pipeline logs, classify failure categories) to make the 'what' more comprehensive.

Add common trigger synonyms such as 'build broken', 'pipeline failed', or 'red build' alongside the existing 'CI is red'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain precisely ('Azure SDK for .NET pull requests') and specific actions ('Analyze CI failures... post a comment with how-to-fix instructions'), with a minor gap: 'analyze' is a generic verb and the action list is not comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (analyze CI failures, post a comment with how-to-fix instructions) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause containing concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say — 'failing checks', 'CI is red', 'someone asks for help fixing CI' — but misses common synonyms like 'build broken', 'pipeline failed', or 'red X'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Azure SDK for .NET PR CI analysis) with distinct triggers; unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net

Path

.github/skills/analyze-ci-failures/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.