Prepare a day-one patch for a game launch. Scopes, prioritises, implements, and QA-gates a focused patch addressing known issues discovered after gold master but before or immediately after public launch. Treats the patch as a mini-sprint with its own QA gate and rollback plan.
65
80%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/day-one-patch/SKILL.mdEvery shipped game has a day-one patch. Planning it before launch day prevents chaos. This skill scopes the patch to only what is safe and necessary, gates it through a lightweight QA pass, and ensures a rollback plan exists before anything ships. It is a mini-sprint — not a hotfix, not a full sprint.
When to run:
Day-one patch scope rules:
Output: production/releases/day-one-patch-[version].md
Read:
production/stage.txt — confirm project is in Release stageproduction/gate-checks/ — read the release gate verdictproduction/qa/bugs/*.md — load all bugs with Status: Open or Fixed — Pending Verificationproduction/sprints/ most recent — understand what shippedproduction/security/security-audit-*.md most recent — check for any open security itemsIf production/stage.txt is not Release or Polish:
"Day-one patch prep is for Release-stage projects. Current stage: [stage]. This skill is not appropriate until you are approaching launch."
For each open bug, evaluate:
| Criterion | Include in day-one? |
|---|---|
| S1 or S2 severity | Yes — must include if safe to fix |
| P1 priority | Yes |
| Fix estimated < 4 hours | Yes |
| Fix requires architecture change | No — defer to 1.1 |
| Fix introduces new code paths | No — too risky |
| Fix is data/config only (no code change) | Yes — very low risk |
| Cert feedback requirement | Yes — required for platform approval |
| S3/S4 severity | Only if trivial config fix; otherwise defer |
Use AskUserQuestion:
[A] Approve this scope / [B] Adjust — I want to add or remove items / [C] No day-one patch neededIf [C]: output "No day-one patch required. Proceed to /launch-checklist." Stop.
Sum estimated effort. If total exceeds 1 day of work:
"⚠️ Patch scope is [N hours] — this exceeds a safe day-one window. Consider deferring lower-priority items to patch 1.1. A bloated day-one patch introduces more risk than it removes."
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm proceeding or reduce scope.
Before any code is written, define the rollback procedure. This is non-negotiable.
Spawn release-manager via Task. Ask them to produce a rollback plan covering:
Present the rollback plan. Ask: "May I write this rollback plan to production/releases/rollback-plan-[version].md?"
Do not proceed to Phase 4 until the rollback plan is written.
For each bug in the approved scope, spawn a focused implementation loop:
Spawn lead-programmer via Task with:
The lead-programmer implements and runs targeted tests.
Spawn qa-tester via Task to verify: does the bug reproduce after the fix?
For config/data-only fixes: make the change directly (no programmer agent needed). Confirm the value changed and re-run any relevant smoke test.
This is a lightweight QA pass — not a full /team-qa. The patch is already QA-approved from the release gate; we are only re-verifying the changed areas.
Spawn qa-lead via Task with:
Ask qa-lead to determine: Is a targeted smoke check sufficient, or do any fixes touch systems that require a broader regression?
Run the required QA scope:
/smoke-check [affected-systems]tests/unit/ and tests/integration/ for affected systemsQA verdict must be PASS or PASS WITH WARNINGS before proceeding. If FAIL: scope the failing fix out of the day-one patch and defer to 1.1.
# Day-One Patch: [Game Name] v[version]
**Date prepared**: [date]
**Target release**: [launch date or "day of launch"]
**Base build**: [gold master tag or commit]
**Patch build**: [patch tag or commit]
---
## Patch Notes (Internal)
### Bugs Fixed
| BUG-ID | Severity | Description | Fix summary |
|--------|----------|-------------|-------------|
| BUG-NNN | S[1-4] | [description] | [one-line fix] |
### Deferred to 1.1
| BUG-ID | Severity | Description | Reason deferred |
|--------|----------|-------------|-----------------|
| BUG-NNN | S[1-4] | [description] | [reason] |
---
## QA Sign-Off
**QA scope**: [Targeted smoke / Broader regression]
**Verdict**: [PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS]
**QA lead**: qa-lead agent
**Date**: [date]
**Warnings (if any)**: [list or "None"]
---
## Rollback Plan
See: `production/releases/rollback-plan-[version].md`
**Trigger condition**: If [N] or more S1 bugs are reported within [X] hours of launch, execute rollback.
**Rollback owner**: [user / producer]
---
## Approvals Required Before Deploy
- [ ] lead-programmer: all fixes reviewed
- [ ] qa-lead: QA gate PASS confirmed
- [ ] producer: deployment timing approved
- [ ] release-manager: platform submission confirmed
---
## Player-Facing Patch Notes
[Draft for community-manager to review before publishing]
[list player-facing changes in plain language]Ask: "May I write this patch record to production/releases/day-one-patch-[version].md?"
After the patch record is written:
/patch-notes to generate the player-facing version of the patch notes/bug-report verify [BUG-ID] for each fixed bug after the patch is live/bug-report close [BUG-ID] for each verified fix/retrospective launchIf any S1 bugs remain open after the patch:
"⚠️ S1 bugs remain open and were not patched. These are accepted risks. Document them in the rollback plan trigger conditions — if they occur at scale, rollback may be preferable to a follow-up patch."
Use AskUserQuestion:
[A] Run /patch-notes — generate player-facing patch notes[B] Run /bug-report to log any issues found post-deploy[C] Stop here/patch-notes is a required output, not optional984023d
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.