Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A disciplined, example-rich specification that gives exact values and named assets for every rule and closes with a three-question self-check — strong on actionability and token efficiency. Its weaknesses are the inlined version-history changelog and a dangling reference to brand-kit.pptx, which the description and body both promise but which is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced brand-kit.pptx (or move its five pages into a references/ file) so the promised 品牌手册 and template pages actually resolve, or remove the reference.
Move the V2.0/V2.1 change history and effective date out of the opening paragraph into a short "版本记录" section so version-sensitive text doesn't sit in the main guidance.
Add a brief explicit procedure (e.g., 1) pick template page → 2) write conclusion-style titles → 3) fill components from the element library → 4) run 自检三问) so the production workflow reads as one ordered process with the existing validation checkpoint at the end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and information-dense — exact hex values, point sizes, named fonts with fallbacks, and a do/don't table with no filler and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, which sits above anchor 3. It falls short of 5 because time-sensitive version information is inlined in the opening paragraph ("V2.1，2026年9月25日起执行…V2.0：品牌视觉更新…V2.1：新增设计元素库") rather than being confined to a changelog/deprecated section, which the guidelines penalize. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete and executable: exact colors with proportions ("柿红 #D9531E…不超过一成"), exact type scale ("页面标题 28 至 32 磅…行距 1.3 至 1.4"), fallback fonts, named Tabler icons per category ("train 高铁；plane 航班…"), component specs, and worked do/don't title examples ("写'几天几晚加这趟行程的节奏'…不写'行程概览'"). It matches anchor 5: specific examples cover the common cases with copy-paste-ready values. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The production path is implicitly sequenced (start from the template pages "内容需要时从对应的模板页开始", apply the content rules and element library, compare against the 要这样/不要这样 table) and ends with an explicit validation checklist ("交付前，顾问对照三问看一遍"). It matches anchor 4 (clear sequence with most checkpoints) rather than 5 because the steps are distributed across sections rather than given as one explicit ordered procedure, and there is no error-recovery loop; it is not 3 since a concrete pre-delivery validation checkpoint is present and no destructive/batch operation applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Within SKILL.md the organization is clean (eight numbered sections, tables for colors, icons, and components), but the only bundle reference — "本目录下的 `brand-kit.pptx` 是品牌手册" — does not resolve: no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist and no brand-kit.pptx is present in the bundle, so a quarter of the skill's promised material (the five-page manual and the templates it contains) is unavailable. This matches anchor 3 (structure present, references not properly backed) rather than 4, where references are expected to be real and clearly navigable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |