Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-dense analytical framework with concrete thresholds, clear sequencing, and a strong output template. Its weaknesses are the absence of any data-retrieval mechanism and a single-file layout that inlines reference-grade material (indicator catalogs, central-bank signal tables) instead of splitting it into bundled reference files.
Suggestions
Move the indicator-threshold tables and per-central-bank signal tables into a references/ file (e.g., references/indicators.md, references/central-banks.md), keeping SKILL.md as the workflow overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Add concrete data-retrieval guidance — URLs or commands for NBS, Caixin PMI, FRED/BLS, and ECB releases, plus release calendars — so Step 1 is executable rather than a list of source names.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow, e.g., 'If growth and inflation indicators conflict on the stage assignment, state both readings and weight by which deviation is larger' before finalizing the allocation tilt.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely dense, threshold-driven tables with genuinely non-obvious domain knowledge (China-specific LPR/DR007/RRR thresholds, pork-cycle caveat on CPI, Politburo tone-setting priority). Minor over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows ('Excludes food and energy', 'Inversion signals recession (leads by 12-18 months)') and an Overview that repeats the description keep it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete numeric thresholds, named data sources, explicit decision criteria per step, and a full copy-adaptable output template give mostly executable guidance. It falls short of 5 because data collection (Step 1) lists indicators and source institutions but gives no commands, URLs, or endpoints for actually retrieving the data. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (collect → cycle positioning → policy impact → allocation tilt) with numbered decision criteria per step and a structured output format including Risk Warnings. Not 5 because validation is implicit (the Notes section) rather than an explicit checkpoint like 'if indicators conflict, report both and weight by magnitude'; well above the bare-list anchor at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a ~190-line monolith with all reference-type material (indicator catalogs, per-central-bank signal tables, the Merrill Lynch clock) inlined in SKILL.md. Section structure is good, but content that would naturally live in separate reference files is inline and there are no references to signal, matching the anchor 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |