Conciseness

Mostly efficient but padded in places: the 'common errors' table (line 144) and '两种错误倾向' section restate points already made in the six-step method, and the heavy Mao quotation framing repeats the same guidance; it could be tightened without losing meaning.

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete guidance — a six-step method, a self-review checklist (lines 110-117), and a copy-paste structured report template with explicit fill rules — with only minor abstract phrasing remaining.

Workflow Clarity

The process is clearly sequenced (第一步 through 第六步) with a checklist and an output template plus a follow-up loop (line 186); checkpoints are present but somewhat implicit rather than explicit validation gates, keeping it below a 5.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized with clear section headers and one-level-deep cross-skill references signaled in '与其他 skill 的关系'; the lone reference to original-texts.md is a dangling pointer (no bundle file exists), a minor organization gap that keeps it from a 5.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('structured self-review, feedback processing, and continuous correction') with only minor coverage gaps; not a comprehensive list of all review activities, so it sits just below a 5.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('structured self-review, feedback processing, and continuous correction') and 'when' ('Trigger after delivery or at a review checkpoint when quality must be examined honestly') with concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Provides good keyword coverage including natural synonyms users say ('review、audit、retrospective、quality check、纠错与复盘'), but the English line is more abstract and a few common phrasings are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (honest self-review and non-defensive error correction) with a specific trigger; mostly distinct from generic review skills with only minor overlap risk.