Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced, with concrete checklists, examples, and a structured report template. Its weak spots are verbosity from repeated philosophical quotations and a dangling reference to an original-texts.md file that does not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Resolve the original-texts.md reference: either add the file to a references/ directory or remove the inline pointer, so no signaled path is missing.
Condense the Mao quotations into a brief "principles" callout or move them to the referenced file, keeping the core method and report template as the lean main body.
Optional: split the structured report template into a separate reference file so SKILL.md stays an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The guidance is mostly efficient and instructional, but the Mao quotations and repeated restatements of the same principles add tokens that do not all earn their place, keeping it below the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 8-item self-criticism checklist, specific do/don't examples ("在第三步我跳过了验证环节，导致后面出现了 X 问题"), and a fully specified report template with table columns and fill-in rules — copy-paste ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (第一步→第六步) with an explicit checklist, error-tendency taxonomy, a common-errors table, and a report-generation procedure with fill rules and a follow-up closure note provides well-sequenced checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, yet the body references original-texts.md ("详细原著依据见 original-texts.md") which is not present in the bundle; the skill is otherwise a single monolithic file with section structure but no real file split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |