Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient skill body that delegates detail to one cleanly signaled reference. The main gap is the lack of an explicit validation/retry feedback loop in the core workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the workflow (e.g., verify the returned STEP matches the requested model and source version before importing) so the sequence has a clear validate-then-proceed gate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-oriented with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (boards, STEP files, CAD), so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete tool calls ("Query `cad.board_model`","Read the structured board catalog row") and file paths, but the exact parameters and import flow are deferred to the reference, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step numbered sequence with a "report missing fields as assumptions or uncertainty" checkpoint is present, but there is no explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that points to a single, verified, one-level-deep reference (`references/board-tool.md`), clearly signaled in both the workflow and a dedicated References section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |