Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is an exemplar of an instruction-only review skill: tight, concrete, and unambiguous about what to read, how to measure, how to classify findings, and how to format the final report. No bundle files are needed or referenced.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what a PCB, DRC, or BOM is, and every line (including the footprint-geometry caution) is load-bearing rather than padded. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable: names exact files (source/pcb.config.json, product/bom.json, product/constraints.json, reports/), exact `pcb.measure` sub-commands with their return values, and a fixed report structure with a hard P0-citation rule. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 5-step procedure with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Compare declared intent against produced artifacts"), a P0 evidence gate ("If you cannot measure it, it is not a P0"), and a defined end-state; the read-only, non-destructive nature means no batch/destructive cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained ~45-line skill with no bundle files and no external references, organized into clear sections (Procedure, Priorities, Report Format, Out of scope) — meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |